Secretary of Labor v. Portable, Inc. (Commission decision, February 21, 2017)

Secretary of Labor v. Portable, Inc. (FMSHRC EAJA 2015-1 M): Fee dispute dismissed after settlement

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
EAJA 2015-1 M
Decided
February 21, 2017
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-01

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2017, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2017
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Portable prevailed in the underlying penalty case when a Commission judge vacated the citation against it. Portable then sought fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and the judge awarded the requested $62,217.82 after finding that the Secretary's position was not substantially justified. The Commission granted the Secretary's petition for review. Before review was decided, the parties reported that they had completely resolved the fee dispute through settlement. The Commission granted their joint motion and dismissed the proceeding.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 5 U.S.C. § 504; 29 C.F.R. § 2704.305
  • Outcome: The parties' joint dismissal motion was granted after settlement, and the EAJA proceeding was dismissed.
  • Key point: A complete settlement ended Commission review of the $62,217.82 attorney-fee award without a merits ruling.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20004-1710

SECRETARY OF LABOR,                           :

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH                  :

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)                     :                                

: Docket No. EAJA 2015-1-M

v.                                            
 :                                

:                                

PORTABLE, INC.                                          :                                

BEFORE:  Althen, Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BY THE COMMISSION:

This proceeding involves an application for an award of attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”).  5 U.S.C. § 504.  Portable, Inc., prevailed   over the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration in a penalty proceeding under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012).  The Commission Administrative Law Judge vacated the citation at issue.  36 FMSHRC 3249  (Dec. 2014) (ALJ).  Portable then filed an EAJA application on the ground that the Secretary  of Labor’s position was not substantially justified.  The Judge held that the Secretary’s position was not substantially justified and granted the
$62,217.82 award requested in the application.  37 FMSHRC 1405 (July 2015) (ALJ).  The Secretary filed a petition for discretionary review, which the Commission granted.

The Secretary and Portable have filed a joint motion to dismiss notifying the Commission that the parties have reached a complete resolution of this matter through settlement.  See 29 C.F.R. § 2704.305.

Upon
consideration of the settlement and joint motion filed by the parties, the motion is GRANTED and this proceeding is DISMISSED .

/s/ William I. Althen

William I. Althen, Acting Chairman

/s/
Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner

/s/ Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace