Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Union Rock and Materials Corporation (Commission decision, April 14, 1980)

Union Rock and Materials (FMSHRC DENV 78-579-PM): Late review petition dismissed

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
DENV 78-579-PM
Decided
April 14, 1980
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1980
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
The Commission dismissed a petition for discretionary review as untimely. This ended Commission review of the ALJ decision in this proceeding; the order does not decide the underlying penalty dispute. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

A petition sought Commission review of an ALJ decision involving Union Rock and Materials Corporation. The Mine Act required the petition to be filed and served within 30 days of the judge's decision. Commission rules treated filing as effective when the petition was received. The Commission received this petition more than 30 days after the judge's decision and dismissed it as untimely. It did not address the underlying dispute or assess a penalty in this order.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i) and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.5(d).
  • Outcome: Review petition dismissed as untimely; no penalty assessed by this order.
  • Key point: Receipt after the 30 day deadline made the petition late under the Commission's filing rule.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
MSHA V. UNION ROCK & MATERIALS
DDATE:
19800414
TTEXT:

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC
April 14, 1980

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY and HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. DENV 78-579-PM
v.
UNION ROCK AND MATERIALS
CORPORATION

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
Section 113(d)(2)(A)(i) requires that a petition for discretionary review be filed and served within 30 days after the issuance of the judge's decision. 1/ Commission Rule 5(d), 29 CFR 2700.5(d) (1979), states that "filing of a petition for discretionary review is effective only upon receipt." The petition for discretionary review was received by the Commission on April 7, 198O, more than thirty days after the issuance of the judge's decision.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as untimely filed. 2/
________
1/ 30 U.S.C. 823(d)(2)(A)(i) (Supp. II 1978). 2/ See Sunbeam Coal Corporation, Docket No. PITT 79-210 through 79-214, (order dated March 10, 1980).

~783
Distribution

Gary W. Houston, Esq.
Union Rock and Materials Corporation
1000 Kiewit Plaza
Omaha, Nebraska 68131

Malcolm R. Trifon, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
11071 Federal Building
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102

Honorable William Fauver
Administrative Law Judge
2 Skyline, lOth Floor
5203 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, Virginia 22041

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace