Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Cambridge Mining Corporation (Commission decision, August 3, 1979)

Cambridge Mining Corporation (FMSHRC DENV 77-7-P): Unsupported mine rib violation affirmed

Decision type
Commission decision
Dockets
DENV 77-7-P, IBMA 77-50
Decided
August 3, 1979
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-23
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1979, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1979
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
The Commission affirmed the roof-and-rib support violation and the judge's $50 penalty. This is a final Commission decision, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

An inspector found loose, unsupported ribs along a working place at Cambridge Mining's mine. The company planned to install mesh and gunnite and to move work elsewhere until then, but the judge found that miners had not been kept out of the affected area or warned with signs. The Commission agreed that the evidence supported a violation of the rule requiring working places to be supported or otherwise controlled against roof and rib falls. It affirmed the judge's decision and left the $50 penalty in place.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.200, requiring adequate support or control of roofs and ribs in working places.
  • Outcome: Violation affirmed; $50 penalty left in place.
  • Key point: Planned repairs did not control the hazard while miners could still enter the affected area.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
MSHA V. CAMBRIDGE MINING
DDATE:
19790803
TTEXT:

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.
August 3, 1979

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Docket No. DENV 77-7-P
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
IBMA No. 77-50
v.

CAMBRIDGE MINING CORPORATION

DECISION

This penalty proceeding arises under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 30 U.S.C. $801-et seq. (1976) (amended 1977). On July 11, 1977, Administrative Law Judge Morehouse found that Cambridge Mining Corporation had violated 30 CFR $75.200, 1/ and assessed a civil penalty of $50. On appeal, 2/ Cambridge argues that no violation occurred.

In finding a violation, the judge credited the testimony of the inspector who described a spalling condition along an unsupported rib in a working place. The judge found:

Here it is clear that the 40 or 50 feet in question in the first entry did have "loose ribs" as observed by the inspector and as evidenced by respondent's decision to place wire mesh and gunnite on the ribs and not have the men work in that area until the gunniting took place. "Working place" means the area of a coal mine inby the last open crosscut ... and the regulation cited above requires working places to be supported or otherwise controlled adequately to prevent persons from falls of the roof or ribs. It is true that respondent had made plans to adequately support the ribs with steel mesh and gunnite and had made the decision to have the men work in another entry until this was done. However, the evidence does not support the conclusion that the men had been withdrawn or specifically instructed by respondent not to go into that area and there had been no danger signs posted. It, therefore, must be concluded that this particular area was not adequately controlled.

1/ Section 75.200 provides, in pertinent part:
... The roof and ribs of all active underground roadways, travelways, and working places shall be supported or otherwise controlled adequately to protect persons from falls of the roof or ribs.
2/ The appeal was pending before the Board of Mine Operations Appeals as of March 8, 1978. Accordingly, it is before the Commission for disposition. Section 301 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. $961 (1978).
~988
We conclude that the judge's determination that unsupported loose ribs existed in violation of 30 CFR $75.200 is supported by the evidence. Accordingly, the judge's decision is affirmed.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace