Disciplinary Proceeding (ALJ decision, July 2, 1999)
Disciplinary Proceeding (FMSHRC D 99-1): Prosecutor appointment requested
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1999 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor referred Connie Prater for possible disciplinary proceedings, then withdrew from participating in the matter. Judge T. Todd Hodgdon found that the withdrawal left no one to represent the Commission's interests in enforcing ethical standards for practitioners. He therefore applied to the Commission to appoint counsel to prosecute the matter at the hearing. The order addressed case administration and did not decide whether disciplinary misconduct occurred.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.80(a), 29 C.F.R. § 2700.80(c), 29 C.F.R. § 2700.80(c)(1)
- Outcome: The ALJ applied to the Commission for appointment of counsel to prosecute the disciplinary matter.
- Key point: When the referring agency withdraws from a disciplinary proceeding, the Commission may designate counsel to represent its interests.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
[DOCID: f:d991o.wais]
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
July 2, 1999
D 99-1
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
July 2, 1999
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING : Docket No. D 99-1
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROSECUTOR
This disciplinary matter was assigned to me on June 10, 1999, for hearing and decision, pursuant to the June 9, 1999, order of the Commission. It arose out of a referral for disciplinary proceedings by the Secretary of Labor.
On June 16, 1999, a Prehearing Order was issued to the parties receiving the Commission's order. On June 24, 1999, a response was received from counsel for the Secretary stating that: "[T]he role of the Department of Labor in this matter was limited to forwarding to the Commission information that may warrant disciplinary proceedings against Ms. Prater so that the Commission can [sic] take appropriate action. . . . The Department is not a party to these proceedings and does not expect to participate at the hearing in this matter." A copy of the response is attached to this application.
With the withdrawal of the Secretary, there is no one to represent the interests of the Commission in insuring that individuals practicing before it "conform to the standards of ethical conduct required of practitioners in the courts of the United States." 29 C.F.R. § 2700.80(a). Commission Rule 80(c), 29 C.F.R. § 2700,80(c), provides that the Commission "may designate counsel to prosecute the matter before the Judge."
Accordingly, application is made to the Commission for the appointment of counsel to prosecute this matter at the hearing.
T. Todd Hodgdon
Administrative Law Judge
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
)
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING)Docket No. D99-1 _______)
RESPONSE TO PREHEARING ORDER
On April 13, 1999, on behalf of the Mine Safety and Health
Administration, the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the
Solicitor, referred Connie Prater for disciplinary proceedings
pursuant to 29 CFR § 2700.80(c)(1). That provision states
... [A] Judge or other person having knowledge of circumstances that may warrant disciplinary proceedings against an individual who is practicing or has practiced before the Commission shall forward to the Commission for action such information in the form of a written disciplinary referral. . .
Thus, the role of the Department of Labor in this matter was
limited to forwarding to the Commission information that may
warrant disciplinary proceedings against Ms. Prater so that
the Commission can take appropriate action. Attached to the
referral was all of the information the Department has
regarding this matter. The Department is not a party to
these proceedings and does not expect to participate at
the hearing in this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
HENRY L. SOLANO
Solicitor of Labor
Edward P. Clair
Associate Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of the Solicitor
4015 Wilson Boulevard
Suite 400___
Arlington, Virginia 22203 SHEILA K. CRONAN
(703) 235-1153
Counsel for Trial Litigation
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of the foregoing RESPONSE TO
PREHEARING ORDER was mailed this 23rd day of June, 1999, to:
David J. Farber, Esq.
Patton Boggs, L.L.P.
2550 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
______
Sheila K. Cronan
Distribution:
Sheila K. Cronan, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of
Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Suite
400, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified
Mail)
David J. Farber, Esq., Patton
Boggs, L.L.P., 2550 M Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20037
(Certified Mail)
/nj
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace