Ketchikan Pulp Company (Board decision, March 6, 1998)

In re Ketchikan Pulp Company (EAB CWA Appeal No. 96-6): appeal withdrawn and dismissed

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
CWA 96-6, CWA 1089-12-309(g)
Decided
March 6, 1998
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1998, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1998
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the appeal. The EPA listing identifies the record as an Unpublished Final Order. The Board granted EPA's motion to withdraw its appeal after additional research and dismissed the appeal with prejudice. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA withdrew its appeal concerning Ketchikan Pulp Company after additional research into the matters that formed the basis of the appeal. EPA's counsel represented that continued pursuit was not a good use of the Board's or the respondent's time, and Ketchikan Pulp stipulated to the withdrawal. The Board found good cause, granted EPA's motion, and dismissed the appeal with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the decision.
  • Outcome: EPA's appeal withdrawn and dismissed with prejudice.
  • Key point: The EAB granted withdrawal after the parties agreed that continued pursuit of the appeal was no longer useful.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re:
Ketchikan Pulp Company CWA Appeal No. 96-6

Docket No. CWA 1089-12-309(g)

ee eee te ae

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL

On March 6, 1998, EPA filed a motion to withdraw its appeal, CWA Appeal No. 96-6. As grounds for the motion, counsel represents that additional research into the matters which formed the basis for its appeal reveals that continued pursuit of the appeal “is not good use of the Board’s or Respondent’s time.” Motion for Leave to Withdraw Appeal at 1 (March 5, 1998). Counsel further represents that respondent Ketchikan Pulp Company (“KPC”) stipulates to the EPA’s withdrawal of its appeal. Id.

For good cause shown, the Board hereby grants EPA's motion. Consequently, EPA’s appeal, CWA Appeal No. 96-6, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

So ordered.

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Dated: MAR 6 1998
By: [illegible signature]
Edward E. Reich
Environmental Appeals Judge

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Granting Motion to Withdraw Appeal in the matter of Ketchikan Pulp Company, CWA Appeal No. 96-6, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Fax and by Certified Mail,
Return Receipt Requested:

Bert P. Krages II, Esq.
Attorney for Respondent
Ketchikan Pulp Company
900 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 1900
Portland, Oregon 97204
Fax No.: (503) 226-6304

By Fax and by Inter-Office Mail:

Mark A. Ryan, Esq.
Attorney for U.S. EPA, Region X
Idaho Operations Office
U.S. EPA
1435 North Orchard Street
Boise, Idaho 83706
Fax No.: (208) 378-5744

Robert Perlis, Esq.
Office of General Counsel
MC 2333
401 M Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
Fax No.: (202) 401-1065

David Drelich, Esq.
Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance
MC 2243A
401 M Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
Fax No.: (202) 564-0054

Dated: MAR 6 1998
Hale Hawbecker, Esq.
Office of General Counsel
401 M Street, SW

MC 2322
Washington, D.C. 20460
Fax No.: (202) 260-8392

Rosemarie Kelley, Esq.
Office of General Counsel
401 M Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
Fax No.: (202) 564-9001

Annette Duncan

Secrétary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace