New York State Department of Transportation (Board decision, August 14, 2020)

In re New York State Department of Transportation (EAB CWA Appeal No. 20-(01)): corrected Initial Decision becomes final

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
CWA 20-(01), CWA-02-2016-3403
Decided
August 14, 2020
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2020, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2020
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the proceeding. The Board declined to review the Corrected Initial Decision and Order on its own initiative because neither party appealed, and the decision would become a final order on August 28, 2020 under 40 C.F.R. § 22.27(c). The full text below is the official EPA release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Chief Administrative Law Judge Susan L. Biro issued an Initial Decision and Order involving the New York State Department of Transportation and later issued a corrected version on July 14, 2020. Neither party appealed. The Environmental Appeals Board declined to review the case on its own initiative under 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.27(c)(4) and 22.30(b). The Corrected Initial Decision and Order therefore became a final order on August 28, 2020. The EAB order does not state the underlying Clean Water Act allegations, liability findings, or any penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.27(c), 22.27(c)(4), and 22.30(b)
  • Outcome: The EAB declined sua sponte review, and the Corrected Initial Decision and Order became final on August 28, 2020.
  • Key point: When neither party appeals and the EAB declines sua sponte review, a corrected Initial Decision and Order becomes final under 40 C.F.R. § 22.27(c).

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

F I L E D
Aug 14 2020

Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board

INITIALS ______

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.


)
In re:
)
)
New York State Department
) CWA Appeal No. 20-(01)
of Transportation
)
)
Docket No. CWA-02-2016-3403
)
______)
ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUA SPONTE REVIEW

On June 29, 2020, Chief Administrative Law Judge Susan L. Biro issued and served on the parties an Initial Decision and Order in the above-captioned case. Judge Biro subsequently issued and served a Corrected Initial Decision and Order on July 14, 2020. Neither party appealed. The Environmental Appeals Board declines to review the case on its own initiative. See 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.27(c)(4), 22.30(b). Accordingly, the Corrected Initial Decision and Order will become a final order on August 28, 2020, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.27(c). So ordered. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Aug 14 2020
Date:_______

1

By: ________
Aaron P. Avila
Environmental Appeals Judge

The three-member panel deciding this matter consists of Environmental Appeals Judges Aaron P. Avila, Mary Kay Lynch, and Kathie A. Stein.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Declining to Exercise Sua Sponte Review in the matter of New York State Department of Transportation, CWA Appeal No. 20(01), were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated: By Electronic Mail: Alicia McNally, Esq. Assistant Counsel Division of Legal Affairs New York State Department of Transportation 50 Wolf Road, 6th Floor Albany, New York 12232 E-mail: [email protected] Christopher Saporita, Esq. Jason P. Garelick, Esq. Assistant Regional Counsels U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 290 Broadway, 16th Floor New York, New York 10007-1866 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Chief Administrative Law Judge Susan L. Biro Headquarters Hearing Clerk Mary Angeles U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Administrative Law Judges Ronald Reagan Building, Room M1200 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected]

Aug 14 2020
Date:_______


Eurika Durr
Clerk of the Board

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace