Centredale Manor Superfund Site (North Providence, RI) (Board decision, January 15, 2008)

In re Centredale Manor Superfund Site (North Providence, RI) (EAB CERCLA Appeal No. 05-02): petition dismissed as moot

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
CERCLA 106b 05-02
Decided
January 15, 2008
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2008
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the appeal. The Board dismissed the petition with prejudice after the parties' effective consent decree made the petition moot. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Brook Village Associates Limited Partnership and EPA Region 1 jointly notified the Environmental Appeals Board that Brook Village elected to withdraw its petition for review. The notice stated that an effective consent decree between the parties made the petition moot. The Board dismissed Brook Village's petition with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None expressly cited in the released order.
  • Outcome: Procedural dismissal. The petition for review was dismissed with prejudice.
  • Key point: An effective consent decree made the pending petition moot.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

             BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
         UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                         WASHINGTON, D.C.

                                                 )

In re: )
)
Centredale Manor Superfund Site ) CERCLA 106(b) 05-02 (North Providence, RI) )
)
)

                   ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

     By submission dated May 10, 2007, Brook Village Associates Limited Partnership

(“Brook Village”) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 jointly notify the Board that Brook Village elects to withdraw its Petition for Review in the above-captioned matter. The Notice states that because a consent decree between the parties is now effective, Brook Village's Petition for Review is moot. Notice at 2. Accordingly, the Board hereby dismisses Brook Village's Petition with prejudice.

     So ordered.

            Dated: January 15, 2008
                                    ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

                                    By: [signature]
                                        Kathie A. Stein
                                        Environmental Appeals Judge


                        CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review, in the matter of Centredale Manor Superfund Site (North Providence, RI), CERCLA 106(b) 05-02, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By First Class Mail,
Postage Prepaid, Howard J. Castleman
Murtha Cullina, LLP
99 High Street
Boston, MA 02110

By Pouch Mail Eve S. Vaudo
Senior Enforcement Counsel
U.S. EPA Region 1
One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (SES)
Boston, MA 02114

                         [signature]
                         Annette Duncan,
                         Secretary

                         Dated: 1/15/08

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace