The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and ECDC Environmental L.C./Laidlaw Environmental Services (Board decision, December 12, 2002)

In re The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and ECDC Environmental L.C./Laidlaw Environmental Services (EAB CERCLA § 106(b) Petition No. 96-5): petition withdrawn with prejudice

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
CERCLA 106(b) 96-5
Decided
December 12, 2002
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2002, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2002
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the CERCLA section 106(b) reimbursement petition. The Board approved the petitioners\x27 withdrawal with prejudice and removed the matter from its docket. The full text below is the official EPA release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and ECDC Environmental L.C./Laidlaw Environmental Services had a CERCLA section 106(b) petition for reimbursement before the Environmental Appeals Board. The petitioners stated that a consent agreement approved by the Board resolved the matter and that they were withdrawing the petition with prejudice. The Board approved the withdrawal and removed the case from its docket.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 42 U.S.C. § 9606(b)(2)(A)
  • Outcome: The reimbursement petition was withdrawn with prejudice and removed from the Board\x27s docket.
  • Key point: A Board-approved consent agreement led the petitioners to withdraw the CERCLA reimbursement petition with prejudice.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.

_____
)
In the Matter of: )
)
The Port Authority of New York )
and New Jersey, and ECDC ) CERCLA § 106(b) Petition No.
Environmental L.C./Laidlaw )
96-5
Environmental Services )
)
Petitioners
)
_____)

ORDER

By letter dated December 6, 2002, Petitioners in the above-

captioned matter state that, pursuant to a consent agreement

approved by the Board on October 31, 2002, the petition for

reimbursement is withdrawn with prejudice. The Board hereby

approves the request to withdraw the petition, and the matter

shall now be removed from the Board’s docket.

So ordered.

Date: Dec. 12, 2002
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

By: /s/
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order in the Matter of Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and ECDC Environmental L.C./Laidlaw Environmental Services, CERCLA § 106(b) Petition No. 96-5 were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By First Class Mail
Postage Prepaid:

Captain J.M. Collin
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard
District Legal Officer
Seventh Coast Guard District
909 S.E. 1st Ave.
Miami, FL 33131-3050

Martin B. Wasser
Phillips Nizer Krim and Ballon, LLP
666 Fifth Ave.
New York, New York 10103-0084

Hugh H. Welsh
The Port Authority of New York and
New Jersey
Newark Legal Center
One Riverfront Plaza
Seventh Floor
Newark, N.J. 07102

By Interoffice Mail: Earl Salo (2366) Office of General Counsel

Lee R. Tyner (2366)
Office of General Counsel

Stephen Botts (2272A)
Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance

Dated: Dec. 13, 2002
/s/
Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace