Walton CWCA Golden West 70, LLC (U.S. Colloidal Site) (Board decision, May 19, 2009)

In re Walton CWCA Golden West 70, LLC (EAB CERCLA 106(b) Petition No. 08-03): reimbursement petition dismissed

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
CERCLA 106(b) 08-03, 9-2008-0012
Decided
May 19, 2009
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-03

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2009, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2009
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the reimbursement proceeding. The Board granted the petitioner's motion and dismissed the CERCLA reimbursement petition with prejudice after the parties executed a settlement. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Walton CWCA Golden West 70, LLC petitioned for reimbursement of costs it said it incurred while conducting CERCLA removal activities at the U.S. Colloidal Site in Rancho Cucamonga, California. The parties reached a settlement that became effective on May 1, 2009. The Environmental Appeals Board granted Walton CWCA's motion and dismissed the reimbursement petition with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 42 U.S.C. §§ 9606 and 9622
  • Outcome: The petition for reimbursement was dismissed with prejudice after settlement.
  • Key point: A petitioner may withdraw a CERCLA reimbursement petition with prejudice after the parties execute a settlement resolving the claims.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

Filed

MAY 19 2009

Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
INITIALS [illegible]

In re:

Walton CWCA Golden West 70, LLC
(U.S. Colloidal Site)

CERCLA § 106(b) Petition
No. 08-03

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REIMBURSEMENT

On December 11, 2008, Walton CWCA Golden West 70, LLC (“Walton CWCA” or “Petitioner”) filed a petition with the Environmental Appeals Board (“Board”) pursuant to section 106(b)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9606(b)(2), seeking reimbursement of costs incurred in complying with an administrative order issued by United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (“Region”) under section 106(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9606(a).¹ The Board stayed the case on February 6, 2009, at the request of the parties, and this stay has continued until the present time.

On April 16, 2009, the parties filed a joint statement explaining that they had reached terms on a settlement, whose proposed terms were published in the Federal Register for public comment pursuant to section 122(i) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9622(i). Joint Statement of Status and Motion to Extend Stay with Contingent Dismissal (“Joint Statement”) at 1. The comment period expired on April 30, 2009. Id.

¹ Petitioner sought reimbursement of approximately $438,897.40 in costs plus interest that it claims to have incurred in conducting CERCLA removal activities at a property in Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known as the “U.S. Colloidal Site.” Petition at 1-2.

On May 18, 2009, Petitioner filed a motion requesting the Board dismiss its petition for reimbursement with prejudice. Motion for Withdrawal of Petition for Reimbursement at 2. Petitioner explains that the parties have executed a settlement, which became effective on May 1, 2009, and which resolves the underlying claims in the Petition. Id. at 1.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Board grants Petitioner’s motion. Accordingly, Walton CWCA’s petition seeking reimbursement under CERCLA for the U.S. Colloidal Site filed December 11, 2008, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

So ordered.

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

By: Kathie A. Stein
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge

Dated: May 19, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Reimbursement in the matter of Walton CWCA Golden West 70, LLC (U.S. Colloidal Site), CERCLA § 106(b) Petition No. 08-03, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Inter-Office Mail:

Clara Beitin
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave (MC 2272A)
Washington, D.C. 20460

By Pouch Mail:

J. Andrew Helmlinger
Office of Regional Counsel (ORC-3)
U.S. EPA Region 9
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

By First Class Mail:

Roger J. Holt
Greenberg Glusker Fields
Claman & Machtinger LLP
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067

Dated: MAY 19 2009

[illegible]
Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace