Reintjes of the South, Inc. (Commission decision, August 19, 1999)
Reintjes of the South, Inc. (FMSHRC CENT 99-153-RM): Appeal dismissed after petition withdrawal
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1999, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Reintjes of the South, Inc. challenged an ALJ's dismissal of its contest of Citation No. 7867335. After a $100 civil penalty was proposed, Reintjes agreed to pay it in full without changing the citation and moved to withdraw its petition for discretionary review. The Commission granted the motion, vacated its direction for review, and dismissed the appeal.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11
- Outcome: The petition for discretionary review was withdrawn, the direction for review was vacated, and the appeal was dismissed after Reintjes agreed to pay $100.
- Key point: A party may withdraw a Commission appeal under the Commission's procedural rules when the underlying penalty has been resolved.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
August 19, 1999
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) :
:
v. : Docket No. CENT 99-153-RM
:
REINTJES OF THE SOUTH, INC. :
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Marks, Riley, Verheggen, and Beatty, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
On June 24, 1999, the Commission granted a petition for discretionary review filed by Reintjes of the South, Inc. ("Reintjes") challenging Administrative Law Judge Avram Weisberger's Order of Dismissal in which he granted the Secretary of Labor's motion for summary decision, denied Reintjes' motion for summary decision, and dismissed Reintjes' notice of contest with respect to Citation No. 7867335, as modified. Order at 3-4 (May 17, 1999) (unpublished).
On August 12, 1999, pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule 11, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11, Reintjes filed an unopposed motion to withdraw its petition for discretionary review. At the time Reintjes filed its petition for discretionary review, a civil penalty had not been proposed for Citation No. 7867335. A civil penalty of $100.00 has now been proposed for the citation and Reintjes has agreed to pay the penalty in full, without modification of the citation. Reintjes states that the Secretary has no objection to its motion to withdraw its petition. Upon consideration of Reintjes' motion to dismiss the appeal, we grant it. Accordingly, the Commission's direction for review in this matter is vacated and Reintjes' appeal is dismissed.
______
Mary Lu Jordon, Chairman
______
Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner
______
James C. Riley, Commissioner
______
Theodore F. Verheggen, Commissioner
______
Robert H. Beatty, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution
Mark N. Savit, Esq.
Adele L. Abrams, Esq.
Patton Boggs, LLP
2550 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
Stephen Irving, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
525 South Griffin St., Suite 501
Dallas, TX 75202
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
4015 Wilson Blvd., Suite 400
Arlington, VA 22203
Administrative Law Judge Avram Weisberger Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges 5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1000 Falls Church, VA 22041
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace