J & J Sand and Gravel
J & J Sand and Gravel (FMSHRC CENT 98-196-M): Default vacated after timely answer was located
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1999 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
J & J Sand and Gravel was placed in default after it did not answer the Secretary's penalty petition in the Commission's file. The operator had actually sent an answer to the Commission, but the answer was received by the Solicitor instead, and the communication problem was not reported before a show cause order issued. Judge Paul Merlin found that the answer was timely and that the operator should not be defaulted for failing to respond to an order that was issued in error. He vacated the default and assigned the case to Administrative Law Judge David Barbour.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None stated in the order
- Outcome: The December 14 default order was vacated, and the case was assigned for further proceedings.
- Key point: A party should not be held in default for failing to answer an erroneously issued show cause order when its underlying answer was timely.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET, N.W., 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-3868
January 19, 1999
SECRETARY OF LABOR : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. CENT 98-196-M
Petitioner : A. C. No. 03-01735-05512
:
v. :
J & J SAND AND GRAVEL, : J & J Sand & Gravel
Respondent :
ORDER VACATING DEFAULT
ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT
Before: Judge Merlin
On December 14, 1998, an order of default was issued in the above-captioned case
directing the operator to pay the proposed penalties immediately because it failed to file an answer
to the Secretary's penalty petition.
On December 29, 1998, the Solicitor filed a notice of response by the respondent advising
that the operator had filed an answer with his office on August 12, 1998. The Solicitor enclosed
the answer he received from the operator which is dated August 5, 1998, and is addressed to the
Commission. The Solicitor maintains that the default in this case is appropriate because the
operator failed to respond to the show cause order issued on October 19, 1998.
Under Commission precedent, a problem in communication or with the mail may justify
relief from default. Con-Ag, Inc., 9 FMSHRC 989, 990 (June 1987); United Rock Products
Corp., 14 FMSHRC 79 (January 1992); Lynx Coal Company, 15 FMSHRC 979 (June 1993);
AMI Construction, 16 FMSHRC 670 (April 1994); Sandy Jones Construction, 16 FMSHRC
2375 (December 1994). It appears that such a problem occurred in this case. Furthermore, the
operator's August 5 answer was a timely response to the penalty petition which was filed on
August 3, 1998. Consequently, the October 19 show cause order should not have been issued in
the first place. I reject the Solicitor's argument that default is warranted because the operator did
not respond to the show cause order. Failure to respond to an order that was erroneously issued
is not grounds for a default. Indeed, if the Solicitor had timely advised the Commission of the
operator's answer, no show cause would have been issued. Therefore, I find that relief from the
default is warranted.
Page 2
In light of the foregoing, the December 14 order of default issued in this case is hereby
VACATED.
This case is hereby assigned to Administrative Law Judge David Barbour.
All future communications regarding this case should be addressed to Judge Barbour at
the following address:
Federal Mine Safety and Health
Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
Two Skyline Place, Suite 1000
5203 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041
Telephone No. 703-756-5232
Telephone No. 703-756-6201 (Fax)
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Distribution: (Certified Mail)
Brian L. Pudenz, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 525 Griffin Street,
Suite 501, Dallas, TX 75202
Mr. Bill Warford, J & J Sand and Gravel, 15902 Highway 70, Benton, AZ 72015
/gl
2
Page 3
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-3868
Brian L. Pudenz, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U. S. Department of Labor
525 Griffin Street, Suite 501
Dallas, TX 75202
Page 4
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-3868
Mr. Bill Warford
J & J Sand and Gravel
15902 Highway 70
Benton, AZ 72015
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1999, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.