Georges Colliers Incorporated (ALJ decision, January 8, 1998)
Georges Colliers Incorporated (FMSHRC CENT 98-11): Order to show cause for incomplete penalty petition
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1998 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor filed a civil penalty petition against Georges Colliers Incorporated for the Pollyanna No. 8 Mine. Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin found that the petition was incomplete because its exhibit did not include MSHA's assessment sheet identifying the contested violations. He ordered the Conference and Litigation Representative to file the missing information within 21 days or show cause why the case should not be dismissed.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d) and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28(b)
- Outcome: The penalty petition was not dismissed in this order, but the CLR was ordered to complete the filing or show cause within 21 days.
- Key point: A penalty petition must identify the contested violations, proposed penalties, citation or order details, and the governing Act or regulation sections.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
[DOCID: f:cnt98-11.wais]
GEORGES COLLIERS INCORPORATED
January 8, 1998
CENT 98-11
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET, N.W., 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON D.C. 20006-3868
January 8, 1998
SECRETARY OF LABOR
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket No. CENT 98-11 Petitioner : A. C. No. 34-01787-03530 :
v. : Pollyanna No. 8 Mine
GEORGES COLLIERS INCORPORATED, :
Respondent :
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
This case is before me pursuant to section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. 30 U.S.C. § 815(d).
On December 29, 1997, the Conference and Litigation Representative (CLR) filed the penalty petition with an enclosed exhibit for this case. However, the exhibit does not include a copy of MSHA's assessment sheet identifying the violations contested. Commission rule 2700.28(b), 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28(b), requires that the petition list the alleged violations and the proposed penalties, identify each violation by the number and date of the citation or order and the section of the Act or regulations alleged to be violated. Therefore, the petition is incomplete and the CLR must provide the requisite information before this case can proceed.
On November 18, 1997, I issued an order to show cause, copy enclosed, in Quapaw Company, 19 FMSHRC 1927, (Dec. 1997) pointing out that there were an increasing number of recent cases where the Secretary's representatives failed to attach required exhibits to penalty petitions. On November 21, 1997, the Associate Solicitor, for Mine Safety and Health wrote Solicitors and CLRs regarding insufficient penalty petitions.
It is ORDERED that within 21 days the CLR file the necessary information for his penalty petition to fulfill the requirements set forth in the Commission rules or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for inadequate filing.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Enclosure
Distribution: (Certified Mail)
Ned Zamarripa, Conference and
Litigation Representative, U. S.
Department of Labor, MSHA, CMS&H,
P. O. Box 25367, Denver, CO 80225
Mr. G. Matt Richardson, President,
George Colliers Inc., Route 3, Box
696, Henryetta, OK 74437
/gl
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace