Blue Circle, Incorporated (ALJ decision, July 15, 1998)

Blue Circle, Incorporated (FMSHRC CENT 97-154-M, CENT 97-155-M, CENT 97-156-M, CENT 97-157-M, CENT 97-158-M): Settlement approved on remand

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
CENT 97-154-M, CENT 97-155-M, CENT 97-156-M, CENT 97-157-M, CENT 97-158-M
Decided
July 15, 1998
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Checked against source
2026-08-12

What's the rule today?

This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1998
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
ALJ decision, later reviewed by the Commission
This decision was issued by an FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge, but it was not the final word in the case: the Commission directed review, and the Commission's decision is the one citable as precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Blue Circle, Incorporated faced five consolidated civil penalty proceedings at its Tulsa Plant. On remand, the parties proposed modifying and vacating certain citations and reducing the total penalties. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement acceptable under the Mine Act penalty criteria, approved it, and ordered Blue Circle to pay $8,848 within 30 days. The order did not list the individual citation changes.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(d) and 820(i)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved and an $8,848 penalty was ordered across five dockets.
  • Key point: The ALJ approved a remand settlement that changed some citations and reduced the overall penalty without detailing each modification in this release.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FED ERA L M INE SA FETY A ND HEA LTH REV IEW COM M ISSION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, SUITE 1000
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

July 15, 1998

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
: Docket No. CENT 97-154-M
Petitioner
: A.C. No. 34-00026-05597
v. :
: Docket No. CENT 97-155-M
BLUE CIRCLE, INCORPORATED,
: A. C. No. 34-00026-05598
Respondent
:
: Docket No. CENT 97-156-M
: A. C. No. 34-00026-05599
:
: Docket No. CENT 97-157-M
: A. C. No. 34-00026-05600
:
: Docket No. CENT 97-158-M
: A. C. No. 34-00026-05601
:
: Tulsa Plant

DECISION ON REMAND APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Melick

These cases are before me upon petitions for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Petitioner has filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the cases. Modification and vacation of certain citations and a reduction in overall penalties to $8,848.00, have been proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in these cases, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is acceptable under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $8,848.00, within 30 days of this order.

Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Mary K. Schopmeyer, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, 525 South Griffin St., Suite 501, Dallas, TX 75202

Daniel J. Haupt, Conference & Litigation Representative, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), 1100 Commerce St., Room 4C50, Dallas, TX 75242

C. Gregory Ruffennach, Esq., 450 East 3rd Avenue, Durango, CO 81301

/mca

2

What controls your case today?

The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace