Felix T. Carrasco v. Eddy Potash, Incorporated (ALJ decision, September 26, 1994)

Felix T. Carrasco v. Eddy Potash, Incorporated (FMSHRC CENT 94-40-DM): Discrimination case dismissed after settlement

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
CENT 94-40-DM
Decided
September 26, 1994
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1994 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1994
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Felix T. Carrasco filed a discrimination complaint against Eddy Potash, Incorporated under the Mine Act. After a hearing began, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The judge found that the settlement furthered the purposes of the Mine Act, ordered the transcript sealed, and dismissed the case.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, the hearing transcript was sealed, and the discrimination case was dismissed.
  • Key point: The ALJ accepted the parties' settlement as consistent with the Mine Act.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
FELIX CARRASCO V. EDDY POTASH INC.
DDATE:
19940926
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1962

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
(303) 844-5267/FAX (303) 844-5268

September 26, 1994

FELIX T. CARRASCO,
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Complainant :
: Docket No. CENT 94-40-DM
v. :
: SC MD 93-05
EDDY POTASH, INCORPORATED, :
Respondent : Eddy Potash Mine

DECISION

Appearances: E. Justin Pennington, Esq., Albuquerque, New Mexico, for Complainant;

W. T. Martin, Jr., Esq., Carlsbad, New Mexico for Respondent.

Before: Judge Morris

This case is based on a discrimination complaint filed pur- suant to Section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 815(c), (the "Act").

After notice to the parties, a hearing commenced on Au- gust 9, 1994, in Carlsbad, New Mexico.

At the hearing the parties reached an amicable settlement.

Further, counsel recited the terms of the settlement and both parties requested that the transcript of the hearing be sealed and the case dismissed.

The Judge finds the settlement is in furtherance of the Mine Act.

Accordingly, the transcript of the proceedings is hereby sealed and the case is DISMISSED.

John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:


Page 3

E. Justin Pennington, Esq., 3700 Rio Grande Boulevard, NW, Suite
2, Albuquerque, NM 87107-3042 (Certified Mail)

W.T. Martin, Jr., Esq., 509 West Pierce Street, P.O. Box 2168,
Carlsbad, NM 88221-2168 (Certified Mail)

sh

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace