FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket CENT 92-46-M Decided January 21, 1993 Settled Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr.

Young Brothers Incorporated

Young Brothers Incorporated (FMSHRC CENT 92-46-M): Settlement affirmed and $250 penalty assessed

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary sought a civil penalty for a violation described in a section 107(a) withdrawal order issued at Young Brothers’ Atkins Pit. At the hearing, Young Brothers and the Secretary reached an agreement under which the company would pay $250. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. affirmed the settlement and assessed the agreed penalty. The order required payment within 40 days of the decision.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. §§ 817(a) and 820(a)
  • Outcome: The settlement was affirmed and a $250 civil penalty was assessed.
  • Key point: The ALJ approved the parties’ on-the-record settlement and converted the agreed amount into an assessed penalty.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

      FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
                    1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
                            DENVER, CO 80204-3582
                      (303) 844-5266/FAX (303) 844-5268
                              January 21, 1993

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. CENT 92-46-M
Petitioner : A.C. No. 41-03142-05522
:
v. : Atkins Pit
:
YOUNG BROTHERS INCORPORATED, :
Respondent :

                           DECISION

Appearances: Nancy B. Carpentier, Esq., Office of the Soli-
citor, U.S. Department of Labor, Dallas, Texas,
for Petitioner;
Richard C. Baldwin, Risk Manager, Waco, Texas,
for Respondent.

Before: Judge Lasher

 This proceeding was initiated by the filing of a Complaint

Proposing Penalty by Petitioner on February 3, 1992, pursuant to
Section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977,
30 U.S.C. 820(a) seeking assessment of a penalty for a viola-
tion described in Section 107(a) Withdrawal Order No. 3895378
issued May 29, 1991.

 At commencement of hearing in this matter in Abilene, Texas,

on November 17, 1992, the parties conferred and reached an amic-
able resolution of the litigation wherein Respondent agreed to
pay a penalty of $250 for the violation described in the With-
drawal Order. This settlement was approved by my bench order on
the record (T. 4) and such is AFFIRMED here, and the penalty
agreed to is here ASSESSED.
ORDER

 Respondent, if it has not already done so, SHALL PAY to the

Secretary of Labor within 40 days from the issuance date of this
decision the sum of $250.00.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Nancy Carpentier, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department
of Labor, 525 Griffin Street, Suite 501, Dallas, TX 75202
(Certified Mail)

Mr. Richard C. Baldwin, Risk Manager, P.O. Drawer 1800, Waco, TX
76703 (Certified Mail)

ek

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1993, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.