Young Brothers Incorporated
Young Brothers Incorporated (FMSHRC CENT 92-46-M): Settlement affirmed and $250 penalty assessed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary sought a civil penalty for a violation described in a section 107(a) withdrawal order issued at Young Brothers’ Atkins Pit. At the hearing, Young Brothers and the Secretary reached an agreement under which the company would pay $250. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. affirmed the settlement and assessed the agreed penalty. The order required payment within 40 days of the decision.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. §§ 817(a) and 820(a)
- Outcome: The settlement was affirmed and a $250 civil penalty was assessed.
- Key point: The ALJ approved the parties’ on-the-record settlement and converted the agreed amount into an assessed penalty.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
(303) 844-5266/FAX (303) 844-5268
January 21, 1993
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. CENT 92-46-M
Petitioner : A.C. No. 41-03142-05522
:
v. : Atkins Pit
:
YOUNG BROTHERS INCORPORATED, :
Respondent :
DECISION
Appearances: Nancy B. Carpentier, Esq., Office of the Soli-
citor, U.S. Department of Labor, Dallas, Texas,
for Petitioner;
Richard C. Baldwin, Risk Manager, Waco, Texas,
for Respondent.
Before: Judge Lasher
This proceeding was initiated by the filing of a Complaint
Proposing Penalty by Petitioner on February 3, 1992, pursuant to
Section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977,
30 U.S.C. 820(a) seeking assessment of a penalty for a viola-
tion described in Section 107(a) Withdrawal Order No. 3895378
issued May 29, 1991.
At commencement of hearing in this matter in Abilene, Texas,
on November 17, 1992, the parties conferred and reached an amic-
able resolution of the litigation wherein Respondent agreed to
pay a penalty of $250 for the violation described in the With-
drawal Order. This settlement was approved by my bench order on
the record (T. 4) and such is AFFIRMED here, and the penalty
agreed to is here ASSESSED.
ORDER
Respondent, if it has not already done so, SHALL PAY to the
Secretary of Labor within 40 days from the issuance date of this
decision the sum of $250.00.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Nancy Carpentier, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department
of Labor, 525 Griffin Street, Suite 501, Dallas, TX 75202
(Certified Mail)
Mr. Richard C. Baldwin, Risk Manager, P.O. Drawer 1800, Waco, TX
76703 (Certified Mail)
ek
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1993, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.