L.M. Karnes, Employed by J.H. Shears Sons, Inc. (Commission decision, June 22, 1993)

L.M. Karnes, Employed by J.H. Shears Sons, Inc. (FMSHRC CENT 92-333-M): Default order vacated and remanded

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
CENT 92-333-M
Decided
June 22, 1993
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-14

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1993, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
The Commission vacated the $400 default order and sent the case back for the judge to determine whether default was warranted. This order did not decide the underlying penalty. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin entered a default order against L.M. Karnes after Karnes did not answer the Secretary's proposed civil penalty notice or an order to show cause. The judge assessed the proposed $400 penalty. The Commission treated Karnes's later letter as a timely petition for discretionary review, reopened the proceeding, and granted review. Because the existing record did not allow the Commission to decide whether default was warranted, it vacated the default order and remanded for further proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b); 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b)
  • Outcome: The default order was vacated and the case was remanded for the judge to determine whether default was warranted.
  • Key point: The Commission treated Karnes's letter as a timely review petition, then remanded because the record did not resolve whether default was warranted.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

June 22, 1993

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:
:
v. : Docket No. CENT 92-333-M
:
L.M. KARNES, Employed by J.H. SHEARS :
SONS, INC.
:

BEFORE: Holen, Chairman; Backley, Doyle, and Nelson, Commissioners

ORDER

BY: Holen, Chairman; Backley, Doyle, and Nelson, Commissioners

This civil penalty proceeding arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (1988)("Mine Act"). On April 23, 1993, Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin issued an Order of Default to L. M. Karnes for failing to answer the notice of proposed civil penalty filed by the Secretary of Labor or the judge's February 11, 1993, Order to Show Cause. The judge assessed the civil penalty of $400 proposed by the Secretary. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the default order and remand this case for further proceedings.

On May 14, 1993, the Commission received a letter from Karnes asserting that he had not received the Order to Show Cause. Karnes requests that the Order of Default be vacated.

The judge's jurisdiction over this case terminated when his decision was issued on April 23, 1993. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). This decision has become final by operation of law, 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). We can consider the merits of Karnes' submission if we construe it as a request for relief from a final Commission decision incorporating a petition for discretionary review. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (applicability of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to Commission proceedings); Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (relief from judgment or order). We reopen this proceeding to consider Karnes' letter as a timely filed Petition for Discretionary Review, which we grant.

On the basis of the present record, we are unable to evaluate the merits of Karnes' position. In the interest of justice, we remand this matter to the judge, who shall determine whether default is warranted. See Hickory Coal Co., 12 FMSHRC 1201, 1201 (June 1990).

For the reasons set forth above, we vacate the judge's default order and remand this matter for further proceedings.

Arlene Holen, Chairman

Richard V. Backley, Commissioner

Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner

L. Clair Nelson, Commissioner

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace