Cullor Rock Quarry
Cullor Rock Quarry (FMSHRC CENT 92-227-CM): Compensation complaint dismissed after withdrawal
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Tim Ragland filed a compensation complaint against Cullor Rock Quarry. He requested permission to withdraw the complaint. Judge Jerold Feldman granted the request and dismissed the case with prejudice. The scheduled November 5, 1992 hearing in Joplin, Missouri was canceled. The official decision does not identify a mine safety standard or award compensation.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None identified in the official released text.
- Outcome: The compensation proceeding was dismissed with prejudice after the complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint.
- Key point: Withdrawal ended the case and canceled the scheduled hearing.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
TIM RAGLAND V. CULLOR ROCK QUARRY
DDATE:
19921028
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1746
TIM RAGLAND, : COMPENSATION PROCEEDING
Complainant :
v. : Docket No. CENT 92-227-CM
:
CULLOR ROCK QUARRY, : Mine No. 23-01924
Respondent :
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Feldman
The complainant has filed a request for authority to
withdraw his complaint for compensation in the captioned case.
For the reasons stated by the complainant, permission to withdraw
is granted. This case is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice and
the hearing in this matter scheduled for November 5, 1992, in
Joplin, Missouri is canceled.
Jerold Feldman
Administrative Law Judge
(703) 756-5233
Distribution:
Mr. Tim Ragland, 2123 W. Austin, Nevada, Missouri 64772
(Certified Mail)
Mr. Jim Cullor, Cullor Rock Quarry, Rt. 1, Eldorado Springs,
Missouri 64744 (Certified Mail)
Cullor, Incorporated, 20th and Sidney, Ft. Scott, Kansas 66701
/vmy
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1992, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.