Homestake Mining Company of California (ALJ decision, January 5, 1993)

Homestake Mining Company of California (FMSHRC CENT 91-226-RM): Settlement approved and $31,000 in penalties affirmed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
CENT 91-226-RM, CENT 92-344-M, CENT 91-217-RM
Decided
January 5, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision approving a settlement, not Commission precedent
This amended decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Homestake Mining Company of California operated the Homestake Mine and was involved in two contest proceedings and a civil penalty proceeding. The Secretary alleged violations of 30 C.F.R. § 48.7(c) and 30 C.F.R. § 57.14205, and the parties later agreed to reduce three proposed penalties. Judge John J. Morris approved the settlement, affirmed the amended penalties, and dismissed the contest proceedings. Homestake was ordered to pay $31,000 within 40 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. § 48.7(c) and 30 C.F.R. § 57.14205
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, three amended penalties totaling $31,000 were affirmed, and the contest proceedings were dismissed.
  • Key point: The judge found the proposed settlement reasonable and in the public interest.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY
AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
(303) 844-5266/FAX (303) 844-5268

January 5, 1993

HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY, : CONTEST PROCEEDINGS Contestant, :
: Docket No. CENT 91-217-RM
: Citation No. 2653241; 8/8/91
:
v. : Homestake Mine
:
: Docket No. CENT 91-226-RM
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: Order No. 2653196; 8/23/91
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Lead Mine Respondent : Mine I.D. 39-00055 :
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. CENT 92-344-M Petitioner : A.C. No. 39-00055-05681 :
v. : Homestake Mine - Lead
HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY OF :
CALIFORNIA,
:
Respondent :

AMENDED DECISION

Appearances: Henry Chajet, Esq., Ann Simmons, Esq., JACKSON & KELLY, Washington, DC, for Contestant/Respondent;
Robert J. Murphy, Esq., Kristi Floyd, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Respondent/Petitioner;
Gene Ruff, President, Local 7044, United Steel- workers of America, Lead, South Dakota, for United Steelworkers of America.

Before: Judge Morris

These consolidated cases are contest proceedings and a civil penalty proceeding arising pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801, et seq. (the "Act"). The civil penalty proceeding herein is for the alleged violations of mandatory regulations enacted pursuant to the Act.

An expedited hearing commenced in Docket No. CENT 91-217-RM on September 17, 1991. At the hearing held in Denver, Colorado, the United Steelworkers of America were granted leave to intervene.

After an extensive conference, Contestant Homestake Mining Company of California ("Homestake") was granted leave to withdraw its motion for an expedited hearing. The case was further stayed until the Secretary proposed a civil penalty.

On November 5, 1991, the Judge vacated Closure Order No.
3630266.

On July 16, 1992, Docket Nos. CENT 91-217-RM and CENT 91- 226-RM were consolidated.

On October 21, 1992, Docket No. CENT 92-344-M was assigned to the Presiding Judge.

On October 27, 1992, Docket Nos. CENT 91-217-RM, CENT 91- 226-RM, and CENT 92-344-M were consolidated.

On November 6, 1992, a settlement motion, executed by Con- testant and Secretary, was filed. The motion was also served on Cathy M. Dupree, the Miners' Representative of Homestake Mining Company.

No objection has been filed to the settlement motion.

In support of the motion, Contestant and Secretary state as follows:
Order No. 3909125

(a) A section 104(g)(1) Order No. 3909125 was issued to Homestake by the Secretary on March 25, 1991, alleging a viola- tion of 30 C.F.R. 48.7(c). This order was later assessed a penalty of $20,000.

On the basis of information supplied by Homestake, the Secretary agreed to reduce the proposed penalty on this Order from $20,000 to $10,000.

Citation No. 3909122

(b) A Section 104(a) Citation No. 3909122 was issued to Homestake by the Secretary on March 16, 1992, alleging a viola- tion of 30 C.F.R. 57.14205. This order was later assessed a penalty of $9,000.

On the basis of information supplied by Homestake, the Secretary agreed to reduce the proposed civil penalty on this Citation from $9,000 to $6,000.

Citation No. 3901926

(c) A Section 104(a) Citation No. 3909126 was issued to Homestake by the Secretary on Mary 25, 1991, alleging a viola- tion of 30 C.F.R. 48.7(c). This Citation was later assessed a penalty of $20,000.

On the basis of information supplied by Homestake, the Secretary agreed to reduce the proposed civil penalty on this Citation from $20,000 to $10,000.

I have reviewed the proposed settlement and I find it is reasonable and in the public interest. It should be approved.

ORDER

1. The stay of proceeding is LIFTED.

2. The settlement agreement is APPROVED.

3. Order No. 3909125 and the amended penalty of $10,000 are AFFIRMED.

4. Citation No. 3909122 and the amended penalty of $6,000 are AFFIRMED.

5. Citation No. 3901926 and the amended penalty of $15,000 are AFFIRMED.

6. Contestant/Respondent Homestake Mining Company is ORDERED TO PAY to the Secretary of Labor the sum of $31,000 within 40 days of the date of this amended decision.

7. Contest proceedings CENT 91-217-RM and CENT 91-226-RM are DISMISSED.

8. Contest proceedings CENT 91-217-RM and CENT 91-226-RM are DISMISSED.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Henry Chajet, Esq., Mark N. Savit, Esq., JACKSON & KELLY, 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 650, Washington, DC 20006 (Certified Mail)

Ms. Cathy M. Dupree, Miners' Representative, Mr. Gene Ruff, President, Local 7044, United Steelworkers of America, c/o HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, 215 West Main Street, P.O. Box 875, Lead, SD 57754-1603 (Certified Mail

Robert J. Murphy, Esq., Kristi Floyd, Esq., Office of the Sol- icitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1585 Federal Office Building, 1961 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado 80294 (Certified Mail)

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace