B & M Sand & Gravel Company (ALJ decision, January 5, 1990)

B & M Sand & Gravel Company (FMSHRC CENT 89-159-M): Settlement approved and penalty reduced

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
CENT 89-159-M
Decided
January 5, 1990
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-16

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1990
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

B & M Sand & Gravel Company was involved in a civil penalty proceeding concerning its Ennis Plant. The Secretary moved to approve a settlement, vacate Citation No. 3281506, and reduce the penalty for the remaining citations from $1,075 to $806.25. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria. The settlement was approved, the citation was vacated, and the company was ordered to pay $806.25 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 815(d) and 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, Citation No. 3281506 was vacated, and the remaining penalty was reduced to $806.25.
  • Key point: The Judge approved the proposed settlement after reviewing the parties' representations and supporting documentation.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. B & M SAND & GRAVEL
DDATE:
19900105
TTEXT:


Page 2

~5

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. CENT 89-159-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 41-03455-05504

v. Ennis Plant

B & M SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

DECISION

Appearances: Mary E. Witherow, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Dallas, Texas for Petitioner;
W. A. Keith, Dallas, Texas for Respondent.

Before: Judge Melick

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearings Petitioner filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. The Secretary moved to vacate Citation No. 3281506 and proposed a reduction in penalty from $1,075 to $806.25 for the remaining citations. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $806.25 within 30 days of this order.

Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace