Moniteau County Commission
Moniteau County Commission (FMSHRC CENT 88-148-M): Reporting citation vacated and case dismissed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1989 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Moniteau County Commission was cited for failing to file a quarterly mine employment report for its maintenance shop. After a hearing, MSHA determined that the operation was a borrow pit outside Mine Act coverage in the circumstances presented. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. granted MSHA's motion to dismiss, vacated the citation, and dismissed the proceeding. No civil penalty was assessed.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 50.30(a)
- Outcome: Citation No. 3064674 was vacated and the proceeding was dismissed.
- Key point: The case ended after MSHA concluded the borrow pit was not covered by the Mine Act under the facts presented.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. MONITEAU COUNTY COMMISSION
DDATE:
19890420
TTEXT:
Page 2
~657
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. CENT 88-148-M
PETITIONER A.C. No. 23-01971-05502
v. Maintenance Shop
MONITEAU COUNTY COMMISSION,
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Appearances: John J. Matthew, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado,
for Petitioner;
John T. Kay, Esq., Prosecuting Attorney, Moniteau
County, California, Missouri,
for Respondent.
Before: Judge Lasher
This proceeding was initiated by the filing of a proposal
for penalty by Petitioner MSHA pursuant to Section 110 of the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
Section 801 et seq. (1977)(herein the Act). Petitioner sought
assessment of a penalty of $20.00 for an alleged violation of 30
C.F.R. Section 50.30 described in Citation No. 3064674 issued on
March 31, 1988 by MSHA Inspector Dulces N. Mesa as follows:
"The operator has failed to file with the appropriate
MSHA office a quarterly mine employment report (Form
7000-2), after having been advised not to by their
legal representative."
30 C.F.R. 50.30(a) provides:
(a) Each operator of a mine in which an individual
worked during any day of a calendar quarter shall
complete a MSHA Form 7000-2 in accordance with the
instructions and criteria in 50.30-1 and submit the
original to the MSHA Health and Safety Analysis Center,
P.O. Box 25367, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colo.
80225, within 15 days after the end of each calendar
quarter. These forms may be obtained from MSHA Metal
and Nonmetallic Mine Health and Safety Subdistrict
Offices and from MSHA Coal
Page 3
~658
Mine Health and Safety Subdistrict Offices. Each operator shall
retain an operator's copy at the mine office nearest the mine for
5 years after the submission date.
The matter came on for hearing on February 16, 1989 in
Sedalia, Missouri. Thereafter, by motion to dismiss dated April
14, 1989, the Secretary indicated its determination that
Respondent Moniteau County Commission was operating a "borrow
pit" rather than a mine covered under the Mine Act, that borrow
pits are covered by OSHA except in certain circumstances not
present here, that the Citation in question should be vacated,
and these proceedings dismissed.
The motion to dismiss is for all intents and purposes a
withdrawal by MSHA of its prosecution of this matter. Pursuant to
Commission Rule 11 (29 C.F.R. 2700.11) a party may withdraw a
pleading at any stage of a proceeding with the approval of the
Commission or the Judge. In view thereof, and good cause
appearing for the withdrawal of MSHA's proposal herein, the
motion to dismiss is GRANTED, Citation No. 3064674 is VACATED,
and this proceeding is DISMISSED.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1989, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.