Secretary of Labor v. Bob Crumby (ALJ decision, July 22, 1986)
Secretary of Labor v. Bob Crumby (FMSHRC CENT 85-96): Default rescinded after timely answer found
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Bob Crumby was ordered in default to pay a proposed $625 mine safety penalty after the Commission believed he had not answered. A later inquiry found that he had mailed an answer to the Department of Labor's Solicitor within the time allowed, though he had not sent it to the Commission. Chief Judge Paul Merlin accepted the answer as timely because Crumby represented himself and the Solicitor later forwarded it. He rescinded the default order and assigned the still pending case to Judge Gary Melick. This order did not decide the alleged violation or assess a final penalty.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: No specific safety standard is identified in the order.
- Outcome: $625 default order rescinded; penalty case returned to further proceedings.
- Key point: The default rested on the mistaken belief that Crumby had filed no answer during the allowed period.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. BOB CRUMBY
DDATE:
19860722
TTEXT:
~1114
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. CENT 85-96
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 14-01116-03501 I1F
v. Fort Scott Mine
BOB CRUMBY,
RESPONDENT
ORDER VACATING DEFAULT
ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT
Before: Judge Merlin
On July 23, 1985, the Secretary filed a proposal for penalty against the respondent for an alleged violation of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Because no answer had been received, the respondent was ordered on January 28, 1986 to file an answer within 30 days or to show good reason for his failure to do so. As of May 29, 1986 the Commission had received no response and on that date the respondent was found in default and ordered to pay $625, the full amount of the proposed penalty. However, on June 12, 1986, the Commission received a letter from the respondent stating that it had filed an answer. Further investigation revealed that respondent had filed his answer with the Solicitor, but not with the Commission. The answer was postmarked February 22, 1986, well within the 30Äday period for response granted by the order of January 28, 1986. The Solicitor now has forwarded the respondent's answer to the Commission which should have been done at the time. Although the answer should have been filed with the Commission rather than the Solicitor, the operator is pro se. Accordingly, I accept the answer as timely filed.
The default of May 29, 1986 was based on a mistake of fact, i.e. that no answer was filed. I find it is the interest of justice to vacate the default and to allow the case to proceed.
Accordingly, the Order of Default of May 29, 1986 is hereby RESCINDED.
This case is hereby assigned to Administrative Law Judge Gary Melick.
~1115
All future communications regarding this case should be addressed to Judge Melick at the following address:
Federal Mine Safety and Health
Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
Two Skyline Place, Suite 1000
5203 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041
Telephone No. 703Ä756Ä6261
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace