Secretary of Labor v. Homestake Mining Company (ALJ decision, January 23, 1985)

Secretary of Labor v. Homestake Mining Company (FMSHRC CENT 84-98-M): Two citations upheld and two vacated by settlement

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
CENT 84-98-M
Decided
January 23, 1985
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1985
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index for this docket. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA sought penalties for four alleged safety violations at Homestake Mining Company's Homestake Mine. The parties reached a settlement during the hearing. Judge John J. Morris approved it, affirming citations under sections 57.19-106 and 57.3-22 with $20 penalties each. He vacated the two other citations, under sections 57.12-4 and 57.6-8, and all penalties for them. The resulting assessed penalty was $40. The decision gives no further reason for the parties' agreed dispositions.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 57.19-106, 57.12-4, 57.6-8, and 57.3-22.
  • Outcome: Settlement approved; two citations affirmed for $40 total, two citations and their penalties vacated.
  • Key point: The settlement resolved four citations with a split result recorded in the judge's order.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. HOMESTAKE MININIG
DDATE:
19850123
TTEXT:
~149
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. CENT 84-98-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 39-00055-05522

v. Homestake Mine

HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

DECISION
Appearances: Eliehue C. Brunson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S Department of Labor, Kansas City, Missouri, for Petitioner;
Robert A. Amundson, Esq., Amundson & Fuller, Lead, South Dakota, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Morris

The Secretary of Labor, on behalf of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, charges respondent with violating four safety regulations promulgated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.

After notice to the parties, a hearing on the merits commenced on October 30, 1984 in Rapid City, South Dakota.

Prior to the conclusion of the hearing the parties reached an amicable settlement.

The citations, the standards allegedly violated, the initial assessments, and the proposed dispositions are as follows:

30 C.F.R. Section Assessed
Citation No. Violated Penalty Disposition

2097960 57.19-106 $20.00 $20.00
2096744 57.12-4 20.00 20.00
2096745 57.6-8 20.00 20.00
2097986 57.3-22 20.00 20.00

The proposed settlement is in order and it should be approved.
~150
Accordingly, I enter the following:

ORDER

1. The proposed settlement is approved.

2. The following citations and proposed penalties are AFFIRMED:

Citation No. Penalty

2097960
$20.00
2097986
20.00

3. The following citations and all proposed penalties therefor are VACATED:
Citation No.
2096744
2096745

John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace