Secretary of Labor v. Amax Chemical Corporation (ALJ decision, May 15, 1985)
Secretary of Labor v. Amax Chemical Corporation (FMSHRC CENT 84-70-M): Four citations resolved for $60
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor and Amax Chemical Corporation proposed settlement of four citations at the Amax Mine and Mill. Judge John J. Morris found the agreement reasonable and approved it. He vacated Citation No. 2235591, removed the significant-and-substantial designation from Citation No. 2235596, and affirmed the remaining three citations as amended at $20 each. Amax was ordered to pay $60 within 40 days. The order lists the cited standards but does not describe the underlying conditions.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 57.20-3(a), 57.19-120, and 57.19-24.
- Outcome: One citation vacated; three settled for $20 each, totaling $60.
- Key point: The settlement removed one citation and reduced the remaining assessments from the original proposals.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. AMEX CHEMICAL
DDATE:
19850515
TTEXT:
~728
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. CENT 84-70-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 29-00174-05517
v. Amax Mine & Mill
AMAX CHEMICAL CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Morris
This is a civil penalty proceeding initiated by the petitioner against the respondent in accordance with Section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 820(a). The civil penalties are for the violation of mandatory standards promulgated pursuant to the Act.
The citations, the standards allegedly violated, the initial assessments, and the proposed dispositions, are as follows:
Standard
Initial
Citation No. C.F.R. Title 30 Assessment Disposition
2235591 57.20-3(a) $ 20 Vacate
2235739 57.20-3(a) 168 $ 20
2235596 57.19-120 192 20
2235597 57.19-24 178 20
Discussion
The narrative statements contained in the proposed settlement agreement relate to the statutory criteria for the assessment of civil penalties as contained in 30 U.S.C. 820(i).
I find the proposed settlement is reasonable and it should be approved.
Accordingly, I enter the following:
ORDER
1. The proposed settlement agreement is approved.
2. Citation 2235591 and all proposed penalties therefore are vacated.
~729
3. Citation 2235596 is reduced to a non-significant and substantial violation.
4. The following citations and penalties, as amended, are affirmed:
Citation No. Penalties
2235739 $20
2235596 20
2235597 20
5. Respondent is ordered to pay the sum of $60.00 within 40 days of the date of this decision.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace