Secretary of Labor on behalf of Loren E. Nielsen v. Stewart Stone, Inc. (ALJ decision, June 21, 1984)

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Loren E. Nielsen v. Stewart Stone, Inc. (FMSHRC CENT 84-11-DM): Discharge complaint settled for $3,000

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
CENT 84-11-DM
Decided
June 21, 1984
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-20
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1984 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1984
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor filed a Mine Act discrimination complaint on behalf of Loren E. Nielsen after his discharge from Stewart Stone. The parties agreed that Stewart Stone would pay Nielsen $3,000 to resolve claims arising from his employment and termination. Nielsen agreed to withdraw his discrimination complaints, and the Secretary withdrew a request for a civil penalty. Judge Virgil E. Vail approved the settlement and dismissed the case. The decision does not decide whether the discharge violated the Mine Act.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2).
  • Outcome: Settlement approved and case dismissed; $3,000 payment to Nielsen and no civil penalty assessed.
  • Key point: The complaint ended by agreement without a ruling on the alleged discrimination.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. STEWART STONE
DDATE:
19840621
TTEXT:
~1560

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. CENT 84-11-DM
ON ON BEHALF OF
MSHA Case No. MD 83-34
LOREN E. NIELSEN, SR.,
COMPLAINANT
Bird Quarry & Plant
v.

STEWART STONE, INC.,
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Vail

This case is before me upon the complaint filed by the Secretary of Labor on behalf of Loren E. Nielsen, Jr., under section 105(c)(2) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the "Act"), for an alleged unlawful discharge on or about May 13, 1983. The parties have filed a joint stipulation of settlement and proposed order of dismissal in which respondent has agreed to pay Mr. Nielsen $3,000.00 in settlement of, on account of, or arising out of his employment relationship with respondent, specifically the termination of his employment and/or any alleged discriminatory employment practice committed by respondent against the complainant at any time prior to the execution of the agreement. Nielsen seeks to withdraw any and all complaints of discrimination filed with Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration including the complaint above. The Secretary also seeks to withdraw its request for a civil penalty. Each party agrees to bear his own fees and other expenses incurred herein.

I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proferred disposition is appropriate.

WHEREFORE, the proposed settement is APPROVED and this case is DISMISSED.

Virgil E. Vail
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace