Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Independent Gravel Company (ALJ decision, December 12, 1983)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Independent Gravel Company (FMSHRC CENT 83-61-M): $27 silica dust settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1983 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA cited Independent Gravel Company after a South Mill operator at its Webb City Chat Plant was exposed to excessive respirable silica-bearing dust. The original penalty assessment was $54, and the parties proposed settling for $27 after revisiting the violation's gravity. Judge Paul Merlin said prolonged dust exposure remained a serious concern, but approved the reduced amount in light of the company's small size and limited prior violations. He ordered payment of $27 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.5-1/5.
- Outcome: Settlement approved; $27 penalty payable within 30 days.
- Key point: The judge approved a reduced penalty while recognizing the cumulative risk of silica-bearing dust exposure.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. INDEPENDENT GRAVEL
DDATE:
19831212
TTEXT:
~2069
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. CENT 83-61-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 23-00113-05501
v. Webb City Chat Plant
INDEPENDENT GRAVEL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Merlin
The parties have filed a motion to approve settlement in the above-captioned proceeding. The original assessment for the one violation was $54. The proposed settlement is $27.
Citation No. 2095336 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
56.5-1/5 because the South Mill operator was exposed to a excessive level of respirable silica-bearing dust. The parties advise that the gravity of the violation is not as severe as originally was rated. The parties advise that overexposure to silica-bearing dust for short periods will not result in permanent disability. This may be so, but exposure over long periods is a serious matter, and each individual exposure adds to the total. I view this as a violation with gravity. I approve the recommended settlement because the operator is small in size and has a small history of prior violations. In the future, the operator should exercise care over the dust levels.
ORDER
The operator is ORDERED to pay $27 within 30 days from the date of this decision.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace