Secretary of Labor obo Robert Baumann v. MOSenecaManufacturer, LLC d/b/a American Tripoli
Secretary of Labor obo Robert Baumann v. American Tripoli (FMSHRC CENT 2023-0251): Operator's petition for review granted
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Commission granted American Tripoli's petition for discretionary review and combined it with a direction for review issued nine days earlier. It ordered the operator to file an opening brief addressing every issue raised in both review orders. The Secretary was directed to respond 30 days later, followed by the operator's reply 20 days after the response. The order set the briefing sequence but did not decide the merits of the discrimination case.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.75
- Outcome: The operator's petition for discretionary review was granted and combined with the earlier direction for review.
- Key point: The operator's opening brief had to address all issues raised by both the Commission's prior review order and the operator's petition.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA
AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004‑1710
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:
o/b/o ROBERT BAUMANN
:
:
v. : Docket
No. CENT 2023-0251-DM
:
MOSENECAMANUFACTURER, LLC
:
d/b/a
AMERICAN TRIPOLI :
DIRECTION FOR REVIEW
The petition for discretionary review filed by Mosenecamanufacturer, LLC
doing business as American Tripoli (“American
Tripoli”) on June 21,
2024, is granted. This direction for review shall be combined with the direction
for review issued in this case on June 18, 2024. Therefore, the parties shall
file their briefs beginning 30 days from the date of this order in accordance
with the briefing schedule requirements in 29 C.F.R. § 2700.75.
Specifically, American Tripoli shall file its opening brief addressing
all issues raised in the June 18 direction for review and the June 21 petition
for discretionary review. The Secretary shall file her response brief 30 days
later also addressing all issues raised. The operator shall then file its reply
brief 20 days after that.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chair
/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Timothy J. Baker
Timothy J. Baker, Commissioner
/s/ Moshe Z. Marvit
Moshe Z. Marvit, Commissioner
Distribution
List:
Russell
Tidaback
Jordon
Tidaback
American
Tripoli
222
Oneida Street
Seneca,
MO 64865
Laura
O’Reilly, Esq.
U.S.
Department of Labor
2300
Main Street, Suite 10100
Kansas
City, MO 64108
Elaine
M. Smith, Esq.
Quinlan
B. Moll, Esq.
U.S.
Department of Labor
2300
Main St., Suite 10100
Kansas
City, MO 64108
Robert
Baumann
Susannah
M. Maltz, Esq.
U.S.
Department of Labor
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
Mine
Safety and Health Division
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Emily
Toler Scott, Esq.
Counsel
for Appellate Litigation
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
Mine
Safety and Health Division
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
April
Nelson, Esq.
Associate
Solicitor
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
Mine
Safety and Health Division
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202-5452
Melanie
Garris
U.S.
Department of Labor
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Review Commission
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 222-2-5452
Administrative
Law Judge William B. Moran
Federal
Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office
of the Administrative Law Judges
1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Office
of the Administrative Law Judges
1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2024. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.