Secretary of Labor obo Robert Baumann v. MOSenecaManufacturer, LLC dba American Tripoli
Secretary of Labor obo Robert Baumann v. American Tripoli (FMSHRC CENT 2023-0251): Missing case copies prompted a show-cause order
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
American Tripoli filed a motion that relied on cases the Commission could not identify from the information provided. The Commission ordered the operator to submit copies of those cases by December 6, 2024, but it received no response. The Commission explained that it has discretion to vacate review and that continued failure to obey its orders could lead to dismissal. It ordered American Tripoli to show cause within 30 days why review should not be vacated and the proceeding dismissed.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.66(a) and 2700.70(b)
- Outcome: The operator was ordered to show cause within 30 days why review should not be vacated and the case dismissed.
- Key point: Failure to substantiate cited cases and respond to a Commission order exposed the proceeding to dismissal.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
o/b/o ROBERT BAUMANN
v.
MOSENECAMANUFACTURER, LLC
d/b/a AMERICAN TRIPOLI
Docket No. CENT 2023-0251-DM
ORDER
On November 1, 2024, Respondent MOSenecaManufacterer, LLC, d/b/a/ American Tripoli (“American Tripoli”) filed a motion which it entitled “Motion to Cease and Desist Enforcement Actions Pending Final Judgment.” American Tripoli’s arguments relied on purported cases such as “Secretary of Labor, MSHA v. Contestant” and “Mohammed v. Garland.” Mot. at 2.
On November 22, 2024, the Commission determined that the cases relied upon by American Tripoli could not be identified based on the incomplete information provided.[1] The Commission ordered American Tripoli to submit copies of the relevant cases by December 6, 2024.[2] As of this date, American Tripoli has not responded to the Commission’s Order.[3]
The Commission has broad authority to determine whether to grant review of a decision. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(b) (review is not a matter of right “but of the sound discretion of the Commission”). Correspondingly, the Commission also has the authority to vacate review. Birchfield Mining Co., 11 FMSHRC 1428 (Aug. 1989) (holding that vacating directions for review is consistent with the Commission’s powers under 30 C.F.R. § 823(d)); e.g., Pocahontas Coal Co., LLC, 45 FMSHRC 794 (Sept. 2023); Broken Hill Mining Co., Inc., 18 FMSHRC 679 (May 1996).
American Tripoli is placed on notice that continued failure to comply with Commission Orders may result in vacating the Commission’s directions for review[4] and dismissal of this proceeding. Cf., Broken Hill, 18 FMSHRC 679 (vacating review and dismissing the proceeding for want of prosecution where the operator failed to file an opening brief and was not reachable); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(b) (failure to timely file a brief may result in vacation of review); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.66(a) (failure to comply with a Judge’s order shall result in issuance of a show cause order prior to an order of dismissal).
American Tripoli is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within 30 days of the date of this order why the Commission should not vacate its directions for review and dismiss this proceeding. American Tripoli’s response should, at a minimum, provide an explanation for its failure to respond to the Commission’s November 22, 2024, Order. If no response is filed, the Commission’s directions for review in this matter may be vacated, and the proceeding may be dismissed in its entirety.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chair
/s/ Timothy J. Baker
Timothy J. Baker, Commissioner
/s/ Moshe Z. Marvit
Moshe Z. Marvit, Commissioner
Distribution List:
Russell Tidaback
Jordan Tidaback
American Tripoli
222 Oneida Street
Seneca, MO 64865
Russell Tidaback
2701 East Grauwyler Road, Bldg. 1, Dept. #1008
Irving, TX 75061
Robert Baumann
Laura O’Reilly, Esq.
U.S. Department of Labor
2300 Main Street, Suite 10100
Kansas City, MO 64108
Quinlan B. Moll, Esq.
U.S. Department of Labor
2300 Main St., Suite 10100
Kansas City, MO 64108
Elaine M. Smith, Esq.
U.S. Department of Labor
2300 Main St., Suite 10100
Kansas City, MO 64108
Susannah M. Maltz, Esq.
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health Division
201 12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Marcus D. Reed, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health Division
201 12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Emily Toler Scott, Esq.
Counsel for Appellate Litigation
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health Division
201 12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
April Nelson, Esq.
Associate Solicitor
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health Division
201 12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Melanie Garris
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
201 12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Administrative Law Judge William B. Moran
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of the Administrative Law Judge
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
Chief Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
[1] The Commission noted that American Tripoli’s previous filings also appeared to contain incorrect or incomplete case citations. Order at 1 n.1 (Nov. 22, 2024).
[2] All issuances in this proceeding, including the Commission’s November 22 Order, have been mailed to the mine’s address of record in Missouri and sent electronically to the email address provided in American Tripoli’s initial Answer to the Complaint. American Tripoli’s representative, Russell Tidaback, recently submitted a request for record access which listed different physical and email addresses. The Commission’s procedural rules require parties to promptly provide written notice of any change in contact information. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.5(d).
[3] On November 27, 2024, Mr. Tidaback erroneously used the docket number for this discrimination proceeding to file a Notice of Contest regarding a related but separate section 104(b) withdrawal order (No. 9998012). The filing was not a response to the Commission’s Order or otherwise relevant to the proceeding before us. American Tripoli’s contest of the withdrawal order has been docketed (No. CENT 2024-0086) and assigned to an Administrative Law Judge.
[4] The Commission directed review sua sponte on June 18, 2024, then granted American Tripoli’s Petition for Discretionary Review on June 27, 2024.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2024. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.