Secretary of Labor v. Benton County Stone Co. Inc.
Secretary of Labor v. Benton County Stone Co. Inc. (FMSHRC CENT 2022-0104): Hospitalization excused default
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Benton County Stone failed to answer the Secretary's penalty petition, and an order to show cause became a default order. The operator's safety director and MSHA consultant had been hospitalized for surgery and was on medical leave when MSHA emailed him about the case. Benton moved to reopen on the same day MSHA informed it that the default had taken effect. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but cautioned that future late requests might be opposed. The Commission found excusable neglect, vacated the default order, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. §§ 823(d)(1) and 823(d)(2)(A)(i)
- Outcome: The default order was vacated and the proceeding was remanded.
- Key point: A documented hospitalization and immediate action after notice established excusable neglect.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
BENTON
COUNTY STONE CO. INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. CENT 2022-0104
A.C.
No. 03-01730-549529
BEFORE:
Jordan, Chair; Althen, Rajkovich, and Baker, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On July 22, 2022, the Commission received from
Benton County Stone Co. Inc. (“Benton”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty
assessment proceeding and relieve it from the Default Order entered against it.
On
May 23, 2022, the Chief Administrative Law Judge issued an Order to Show Cause
in response to Benton’s failure to answer the Secretary of Labor’s March 22,
2022 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. By its terms, the Order to Show
Cause was deemed a Default Order on or about June 23, 2022, when it appeared
that the operator had not filed an answer within 30 days.
Benton asserts that its failure to timely
file occurred due to certain medical circumstances and the hospitalization of
the Operator’s Safety Director and MSHA Consultant. According to e-mail
correspondence offered by the operator, MSHA had sent an email concerning the
case to Benton’s Safety Director on June 8, 2022, however he was hospitalized
for surgery and on medical leave prior to this date. MSHA informed the operator
on July 19, 2022 that the Order to Show Cause was deemed a Default Order, and
the operator filed its motion to reopen on the same day. The Secretary does not
oppose the request to reopen, but cautions that she may oppose future requests
to reopen penalty assessments that are not contested in a timely manner.
The
Judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when the default occurred. 29
C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules,
relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for
discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. §
823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not direct
review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of
the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the Judge’s order here has
become a final decision of the Commission.
In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance
in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which the
Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the
basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying
relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall
be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim
Walter Res., Inc. , 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993). We have also observed
that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a
showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened
and appropriate proceedings on the merits will be permitted. See Coal Prep.
Servs., Inc. , 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Having
reviewed Benton’s request and the Secretary’s
response, we find that the operator acted with excusable neglect due to the
medical circumstances and hospitalization surrounding the operator’s safety
director and MSHA consultant. In the interest of
justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Default Order. Accordingly,
this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further
proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29
C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/
Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan,
Chair
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Timothy J. Baker
Timothy J. Baker, Commissioner
Distribution:
Blake
Tice
Benton
County Stone Co, Inc.
P.O.
Box 968
Pryor,
OK 74362
April
Nelson, Esq.
Associate
Solicitor
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
Division
of Mine Safety and Health
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202
Emily
Toler Scott, Esq.
Counsel
for Appellate Litigation
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
Division
of Mine Safety and Health
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202
Melanie
Garris
USDOL/MSHA,
OAASEI/CPCO
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin
Federal
Mine Safety Health Review Commission
1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2023. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.