Secretary of Labor v. Continental Cement Company, LLC (Commission decision, March 26, 2014)
Secretary of Labor v. Continental Cement Company, LLC (FMSHRC CENT 2013-542-M): Misrouted contest reopened
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2014, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Continental Cement said it timely mailed its penalty contest with payment for uncontested penalties to MSHA's payment center in St. Louis. That office processes payments but does not recognize or process contest forms, so the assessment became final. Continental acted promptly after receiving a delinquency notice, and the Secretary did not oppose reopening. The Commission reopened the matter in the interest of justice, remanded it, and directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a) and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded for a penalty petition within 45 days.
- Key point: A timely but misdirected contest supported reopening, while operators were warned to send future contests to the Civil Penalty Compliance Office.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004‑1710
March
26, 2014
SECRETARY OF LABOR,��������������������������������������
�MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH�����������������������������
�ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
���������������� v.
CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY,
LLC
����� Docket No. CENT
2013-542-M
����� A.C. No.
23-00217-315870
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������
����������������������������������������������������������������������������� �����
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners[1]
ORDER
BY
THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On June 10, 2013, the Commission received from Continental Cement Company, LLC (“Continental”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine
Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We have held, however, that in
appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on March 14, 2013, and became a final order of the Commission on April 15, 2013. Continental asserts that it mailed a timely contest and its payment for the uncontested penalties to MSHA’s payment center in St. Louis, MO. Continental discovered that MSHA had not processed the contest after receiving MSHA’s delinquency notice, dated May 29, 2013, and promptly filed this motion to reopen. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen, but notes that the payment center in St. Louis, MO, is only a payment processing office which does not recognize or process contest forms. The Secretary urges the operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty contests are timely filed and mailed to the Civil Penalty Compliance Office in Arlington, VA.
Having reviewed Continental’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan��� �
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/Michael G. Young�� �
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.��
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura� ����������������������������������������������������� �����������������������
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Distribution:
Gwendolyn K. Nightengale, Esq.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
1909 K Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC� 20006
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA� 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
[1]
Commissioner Althen was recused from this case.
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace