Mosaic Potash Carlsbad Inc. (Commission decision, December 14, 2010)

Mosaic Potash Carlsbad Inc. (FMSHRC CENT 2010-1226-M): Timely contest makes reopening unnecessary

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
CENT 2010-1226-M
Decided
December 14, 2010
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-08
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2010, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2010
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Mosaic asked the Commission to reopen a proposed penalty assessment involving Citation No. 6571486. The Secretary's records showed that Mosaic's request was postmarked within the Mine Act's 30-day contest period. MSHA therefore accepted the filing as a timely contest and added the citation to an active civil penalty case. Because the assessment never became a final Commission order, the Commission dismissed the reopening request as moot.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
  • Outcome: The reopening request was dismissed as moot because Mosaic filed a timely contest and the assessment never became final.
  • Key point: An operator does not need reopening relief when its contest was filed within 30 days of receiving the proposed assessment.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

December 14, 2010

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

MOSAIC POTASH CARLSBAD INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. CENT 2010-1226-M

A.C. No. 29-00802-228600

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On September 10, 2010, the Commission received from Mosaic Potash Carlsbad Inc. (“Mosaic”) a motion to reopen a penalty assessment that may have become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

The Secretary submits that upon reviewing the records in this proceeding, she has discovered that the proposed penalty assessment for Citation No. 6571486 was delivered on August 12, 2010, and that the motion to reopen was post-marked September 9, 2010, which falls within the 30-day time period for contesting a proposed assessment. She states that the Civil Penalty Compliance Office of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration has accepted Mosaic’s motion to reopen as a timely contest and has added the citation to an active civil penalty proceeding (Docket No. CENT 2010-1166-M).

Having reviewed Mosaic’s request and the Secretary’s response, we find the request to reopen to be moot. The proposed penalty assessment did not become a final order of the Commission. Accordingly, the request to reopen is dismissed as moot.


Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman


Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner


Michael G. Young, Commissioner


Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner


Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution:

Charles C. High, Jr., Esq.

Kemp Smith, LLP

P.O. Box 2800

El Paso, TX 79999-2800

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Melanie Garris, Acting Chief

Office of the Penalty Compliance

U. S. Dept. Of Labor, MSHA

1100 Wilson Blvd. 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace