FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket CENT 2010-1135-D, CENT 2011-42-D Decided January 3, 2011 Procedural Judge Thomas P. McCarthy

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Rodney Payne v. Spiro Mining, LLC, and Its Successors

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Rodney Payne v. Spiro Mining, LLC, and Its Successors (FMSHRC CENT 2010-1135-D): Economic reinstatement ends after missed filing deadline

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2011 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2011
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Spiro Mining had agreed to temporarily reinstate Rodney Payne economically while his discrimination complaint was pending. The Secretary later determined that no violation occurred and dismissed her case, but the judge kept reinstatement in place for 30 days so Payne could file his own section 105(c)(3) action. Payne did not file by the December 17, 2010 deadline. With no remaining avenue for the complaint, the judge granted Spiro's motion, dissolved the temporary reinstatement order, and terminated Payne's economic reinstatement.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(c)(2), 815(c)(3), and 823(d)(1), and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.45(g)
  • Outcome: Temporary economic reinstatement was dissolved and terminated.
  • Key point: Temporary reinstatement ends when the Secretary declines the case and the miner does not file a private discrimination action within the statutory 30-day period.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FMSRHC ALJ DECISION

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001-2021

TELEPHONE: 202-434-9958 / FAX: 202-434-9949

January 3, 2011

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Petitioner

v.

SPIRO MINING, LLC, AND ITS
SUCCESSORS,

Respondent

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT PROCEEDING

Docket No. CENT 2010-1135-D

DENV-CD 2010-14

DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING

Docket No. CENT 2011-42-D

DENV-CD 2010-14

Mine: Calder Mine

Mine ID: 34-02105 A408

ORDER DISSOLVING TEMPORARY ECONOMIC REINSTATEMENT ORDER

FOR FAILURE TO FILE SECTION 105(c)(3) ACTION

This matter is before me on the Respondent’s December 29, 2010 Motion to Dissolve
Temporary Economic Reinstatement Order granted on behalf of Rodney Payne pursuant to
section 105(c)(2) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2). In
Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss, Respondent states that the Secretary has decided not to proceed
under section 105(c)(2), and that Payne has not filed an action on his own behalf under section
105(c)(3) within the allowable 30-day time period. Respondent moves that the temporary
economic reinstatement be terminated and the September 8, 2010 Order of Temporary
Reinstatement be dissolved. For the reasons explained, Respondent’s Motion is granted.

The Secretary filed an Application for Temporary Reinstatement on behalf of Rodney
Payne on August 12, 2010. A hearing was scheduled for September 3, 2010 in Fayetteville,
Arkansas. Prior to the hearing, the parties negotiated a settlement of the issues raised by the
Application and filed a Settlement Agreement and Joint Motion for Temporary Reinstatement.
Mr. Payne signed the Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement,
Respondent agreed to economically reinstate Mr. Payne effective September 6, 2010, until the
merits of his discrimination complaint were resolved.

On September 8, 2010, I granted the Joint Motion for Temporary Reinstatement and
ordered Respondent to economically reinstate Mr. Payne will full pay and benefits as existed
prior to his June 14, 2010 termination, as specified in the Settlement Agreement and Joint
Motion for Temporary Reinstatement.

On November 17, 2010, the Secretary filed a Motion to Dismiss Discrimination
Complaint. In her Motion to Dismiss, the Secretary determined that the provisions of section
105(c)(1) had not been violated. The Secretary vacated the civil monetary penalties proposed
and requested the dismissal of her discrimination complaint without prejudice to the right of Mr.
Payne to file a timely action under section 105(c)(3). On November 17, 2010, Respondent filed
a Motion for Dissolution of Temporary Reinstatement Order.

On November 23, 2010, I issued an Order Granting the Secretary’s Motion to Dismiss
Discrimination Complaint; Order Denying Respondent’s Motion to Dissolve Temporary,
Economic Reinstatement Order; Order Denying Respondent’s Motion For Summary Judgment
Without Prejudice; Order Denying Respondent’s Motion for an Expedited Hearing or
Alternatively for Order Vacating Temporary Economic Reinstatement; and Order Denying
Respondent’s Objections to Complaint and Motion to Dismiss. I concluded, inter alia, that a
temporary reinstatement order remains in effect until final Commission order on the merits of the
miner’s underlying discrimination complaint, even if the Secretary exercises her prosecutorial
discretion not to pursue that complaint under section 105(c)(2). I concluded that under section
105(c)(2) and the terms of my September 8, 2010 Order of Temporary Economic Reinstatement,
there had been no final order on the complaint. I further concluded that Mr. Payne had 30 days
from the Secretary’s November 17, 2010 notification of no violation, to file an action on his own
behalf before the Commission under section 105(c)(3). Finally, I noted that if Mr. Payne did not
initiate a timely action under section 105(c)(3), the “temporary” reinstatement provision was no
longer applicable, and Respondent could move for a dissolution of the Order and obtain a final
Commission order on Mr. Payne’s discrimination complaint.

As set forth in the Respondent’s Motion, Mr. Payne has failed to file his own action
under section 105(c)(3) within 30 days of the Secretary’s November 17, 2010 notification of no
violation. The 30-day statutory deadline expired on December 17, 2010. The expiration of the
allowed time to file an action under section 105(c)(3) leaves no further avenue for Mr. Payne to
pursue his discrimination complaint. Therefore, the temporary reinstatement provision is no
longer applicable and my previous Order of Temporary Economic Reinstatement is dissolved
under Commission Rule 45(g). This Order shall become a final decision of the Commission 40
days after its issuance, unless a petition for discretionary review is granted. 30 U.S.C. §
823(d)(1).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion to Dissolve Temporary
Economic Reinstatement Order be GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that my September 8, 2010 Order of Temporary Economic
Reinstatement is DISSOLVED, and that Mr. Payne’s economic reinstatement is terminated.

Thomas P. McCarthy

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Dolores G. Wolfe, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 525 Griffin St., Suite
501, Dallas, TX 75202

Steven Marusich, 25858 Highline Rd., Spiro, OK 74959

Tony Huffman, Esq., P.O. Box 9, 411 Bruce Ave. NW, Camden AR 71701

/cp

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2011, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.