Michael Sonney v. Alamo Cement Co., Ltd. (ALJ decision, April 20, 2007)

Michael Sonney v. Alamo Cement Co., Ltd. (FMSHRC CENT 2007-1-DM): Discrimination complaint dismissed after employer assurances

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
CENT 2007-1-DM
Decided
April 20, 2007
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-09
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2007 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2007
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Michael Sonney filed a Mine Act discrimination complaint against Alamo Cement Company. An earlier order dismissed the complaint as moot, conditioned on Alamo providing written assurances that it would give neutral employment references and had removed disciplinary references from Sonney’s personnel file. Alamo filed the required representation on April 16, 2007. Judge Jerold Feldman therefore dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3)
  • Outcome: Sonney’s discrimination complaint was dismissed with prejudice after Alamo filed the required written assurances.
  • Key point: The conditional dismissal became effective when the employer confirmed neutral references and removal of disciplinary references.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FMSHRC ALJ Decision

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, DC 20001

April 20, 2007

MICHAEL SONNEY,

Complainant

v.

ALAMO CEMENT CO., LTD.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING

Docket No. CENT 2007-1-DM

SC MD 2006-08

1604 Plant & Quarry

Mine ID 41-03019

FINAL ORDER

Before: Judge Feldman

This case is before me based on a discrimination complaint filed with this Commission
pursuant to section 105(c)(3) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended,30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3) (the Mine Act). The complaint was filed by Michael Sonney against the
respondent, Alamo Cement Company, LTD (Alamo).

Sonney’s discrimination complaint was dismissed as moot by Order dated April 4, 2007.
The Order noted that dismissal of Sonney’s complaint would become effective upon Alamo’s
timely filing of written assurances that it would provide neutral employment references to
Sonney’s prospective employers, and that all disciplinary references had been removed from
Sonney’s personnel record. 29 FMSHRC , slip op. at 7.

The required written representation was filed by Alamo’s counsel on April 16, 2007.

Accordingly, Sonney’s discrimination complaint IS DISMISSED with prejudice.  

Jerold Feldman

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

Michael Sonney, 405 Skyforest Drive, San Antonio, TX 78232

Robert G. Newman, Esq., Jeffrey L. Bryan, Esq., Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, 300 Convent Street,
Suite 2200, San Antonio, TX 78205

Adele L. Abrams, Esq., CMSP, Law Office of Adele L. Abrams, PC, 4740 Corridor Place,

Suite D, Beltsville, MD 20705

/mh

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace