Georges Colliers, Incorporated
Georges Colliers, Incorporated (FMSHRC CENT 2000-65 and CENT 2000-80): Settlement approved and $742.60 penalty assessed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2001 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Georges Colliers, Incorporated returned to the Administrative Law Judge on remand for assessment of a civil penalty. After supplemental hearings about the company's updated financial information, the parties negotiated a settlement. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement acceptable under the Mine Act's penalty criteria. He approved the settlement and ordered the company to pay $742.60 in three installments.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, and a $742.60 civil penalty was assessed.
- Key point: A negotiated penalty settlement may be approved after supplemental financial evidence supports the proposed amount.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, Suite 1000
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
October 17, 2001
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. CENT 2000-65
Petitioner : A. C. No. 34-01787-03557
v. :
: Docket No. CENT 2000-80
GEORGES COLLIERS, INCORPORATED, : A. C. No. 34-01787-03558
Respo ndent :
: Pollyanna No. 8 Mine
DECISION
Appearances: Christopher Grier, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor,
Dallas, Texas, on behalf of Petitioner;
Elizabeth M. Christian, Esq., San Antonio, Texas, on behalf of
Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
These cases are before me upon remand for assessment of a civil penalty in accordance
with Section 110(i) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Following
supplemental evidentiary hearings at which Respondent presented updated financial
documentation and the testimony of Internal Revenue Service Enrolled Agent, Rhonda Schrum
and Craig Jackson, Respondent’s President, the parties negotiated a settlement. A reduction in
penalty to $742.60 was proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation
submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proferred settlement is acceptable under the criteria
set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is
ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $742.60, in accordance with the following
schedule: payments of $247.53 each within 40 days and 70 days of this order and a final payment
of $247.54 within 100 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution: (By Certified Mail)
1156
Christopher Grier, Esq., & Janice H. Mountford, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of
Labor, 525 South Griffin St., Suite 501, Dallas, TX 75202
Elizabeth M. Christian, Esq., 7940 Pipers Creek Road, #1812, San Antonio, TX 78251
/mca
1157
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2001, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.