BP America Production Company, Florida River Compression Facility (Board decision, March 15, 2012)

In re BP America Production Company, Florida River Compression Facility (EAB CAA 10-04): petition dismissed with prejudice after settlement

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
CAA 10-04, V-SU-0022-5.00
Decided
March 15, 2012
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-22

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2012
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the Clean Air Act permit appeal. The Board dismissed WildEarth Guardians' petition for review with prejudice after the parties entered into a settlement agreement that resolved the matter. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

WildEarth Guardians petitioned the Environmental Appeals Board to review BP America Production Company's Florida River Compression Facility permit in CAA Appeal No. 10-04. WildEarth moved to dismiss with prejudice after the parties entered into a settlement agreement effective February 6, 2012. The order states that the settlement resolved the matter. The Board dismissed the petition for review with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the order.
  • Outcome: The Board dismissed WildEarth Guardians' petition for review with prejudice after a settlement agreement resolved the matter.
  • Key point: A settlement resolving a permit appeal can support dismissal with prejudice.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

                                          )

In re: )
)
BP America Production Company, ) CAA Appeal No. 10-04 Florida River Compression Facility )
)
Permit No. V-SU-0022-5.00 )
-------------------------)
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

     On February 20, 2012, the petitioner in the above-captioned matter, WildEarth Guardians,

moved for dismissal with prejudice of its petition for review filed with the Environmental Appeals Board. Motion for Dismissal (Feb. 20, 2012) (“Motion”). WildEarth Guardians states that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement, effective February 6, 2012, that resolves the matter. Id.

     Under these circumstances, the above-captioned petition for review is hereby dismissed

with prejudice.

     So ordered.

                                                 ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Dated: March 15, 2012 By: [signature]
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

   I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the

matter of BP America Production Company, Florida River Compression Facility, CAA Appeal No. 10-04, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By U.S. First Class Mail & Facsimile:
Samantha Ruscavage-Barz Roger R. Martella Jr. WildEarth Guardians James R. Wedeking 312 Montezuma Avenue Sidley Austin, LLP Santa Fe, NM 87501 1501 K St., NW facsimile: (505) 989-8623 Washington, DC 20005
facsimile: (202) 736-8711

Charles L. Kaiser Byron F. Taylor John R. Jacus Sidley Austin, LLP Charles A. Breer One South Dearborn Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP Chicago, IL 60603 1550 Seventeenth St., Suite 500 facsimile: (312) 853-7036 Denver, CO 80202 facsimile: (303) 893-1379

By U.S. First Class Mail Only:
Jeffrey Conrad
BP America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Blvd.
Houston, TX 77079-2607
telephone: (281) 366-2859

By EPA Pouch Mail & Facsimile: By Inter-Office Mail & Facsimile: Sara L. Laumann Kristi Smith Steve Odendahl Air and Radiation Law Office Office of Regional Counsel, Region 8 Office of General Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1595 Wynkoop Street 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. (MC-2344A) Denver, CO 80202-2466 Washington, DC 20460 facsimile: (303) 312-6859 facsimile: (202) 566-0070

     Date: March 15, 2012

                                               Annette Duncan
                                               Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace