Flint Hills Resources, LP (Board decision, July 22, 2010)
In re Flint Hills Resources, LP (EAB CAA Appeal No. 10-03): petition dismissed with prejudice
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2010, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Flint Hills Resources, LP petitioned the Environmental Appeals Board to review a letter from EPA Region 6 concerning its Clean Air Act Title V permit. Region 6 later declared the letter void and of no effect. Flint Hills asked to withdraw its petition, and Region 6 did not oppose the request. The Board granted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal in its entirety with prejudice. The order did not impose a penalty.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 124.19
- Outcome: The petition for review was withdrawn, and the appeal was dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
- Key point: When the agency action underlying a permit petition is declared void, the petitioner may withdraw the petition and the Board may dismiss the appeal with prejudice.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
F I L E D
Jul 22, 2010
Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
INITIALS ________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
)
)
In re: )
)
Flint Hills Resources, LP ) CAA Appeal No. 10-03
)
CAA Permit No. 01445 )
)
--------------------------)
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW
On July 20, 2010, Flint Hills Resources, LP ("FHR") filed a motion to withdraw the
Petition for Review it submitted on June 24, 2010, in the above-captioned case; FHR reports
that Region 6 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has declared "void and of no effect"
the letter upon which FHR had based its Petition. FHR reports that Region 6 does not oppose
this motion to withdraw.
Upon consideration, the Environmental Appeals Board grants FHR's request to withdraw
its Petition for Review, designated CAA Appeal No. 10-03. The Board hereby dismisses the
appeal in its entirety with prejudice.
So ordered.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
By: ____________________
Edward E. Reich
Environmental Appeals Judge
-1-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in
the matter of Flint Hills Resources, LP, CAA Appeal No. 10-03, were sent to the following
persons in the manner indicated:
By Facsimile and First Class Mail:
David M. Friedland, Esq.
Beveridge & Diamond PC
1350 I Street, N.W., Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20005-3311
facsimile: (202) 789-6190
Kevin T. Haroff, Esq.
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
600 Travis Street, Suite 1600
Houston, Texas 77002-2992
facsimile: (713) 227-9508
By Facsimile and EPA Pouch Mail:
Suzanne B. Murray
Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA, Region 6
Fountain Place, 12th Floor, Suite 1200
Mail Code 6RC
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
facsimile: (214) 665-2182
Richard Ossias
Associate General Counsel
Air and Radiation Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Mail Code 2344A
Washington, D.C. 20460-0001
facsimile: (202) 564-75603
Secretary
-2-
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace