Flint Hills Resources, LP (Board decision, July 22, 2010)

In re Flint Hills Resources, LP (EAB CAA Appeal No. 10-03): petition dismissed with prejudice

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
CAA 10-03, CAA Permit No. 01445
Decided
July 22, 2010
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-22

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2010, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2010
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the Clean Air Act Title V permit appeal. Under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19, the Board's decision resolves the petition for review. The Board granted Flint Hills Resources, LP's request to withdraw its petition and dismissed the appeal with prejudice. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Flint Hills Resources, LP petitioned the Environmental Appeals Board to review a letter from EPA Region 6 concerning its Clean Air Act Title V permit. Region 6 later declared the letter void and of no effect. Flint Hills asked to withdraw its petition, and Region 6 did not oppose the request. The Board granted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal in its entirety with prejudice. The order did not impose a penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 124.19
  • Outcome: The petition for review was withdrawn, and the appeal was dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
  • Key point: When the agency action underlying a permit petition is declared void, the petitioner may withdraw the petition and the Board may dismiss the appeal with prejudice.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

                              F I L E D
                                  Jul 22, 2010
                             Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
                             INITIALS ________________________
              ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
     UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                     WASHINGTON, D.C.

                                            )
                                            )

In re: )
)
Flint Hills Resources, LP ) CAA Appeal No. 10-03
)
CAA Permit No. 01445 )
)
--------------------------)

                   ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

     On July 20, 2010, Flint Hills Resources, LP ("FHR") filed a motion to withdraw the

Petition for Review it submitted on June 24, 2010, in the above-captioned case; FHR reports

that Region 6 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has declared "void and of no effect"

the letter upon which FHR had based its Petition. FHR reports that Region 6 does not oppose

this motion to withdraw.

     Upon consideration, the Environmental Appeals Board grants FHR's request to withdraw

its Petition for Review, designated CAA Appeal No. 10-03. The Board hereby dismisses the

appeal in its entirety with prejudice.

     So ordered.

                                         ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD



                                         By:         ____________________
                                                      Edward E. Reich
                                                     Environmental Appeals Judge




                                           -1-

                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

   I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in

the matter of Flint Hills Resources, LP, CAA Appeal No. 10-03, were sent to the following
persons in the manner indicated:

By Facsimile and First Class Mail:

David M. Friedland, Esq.
Beveridge & Diamond PC
1350 I Street, N.W., Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20005-3311
facsimile: (202) 789-6190

Kevin T. Haroff, Esq.
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
600 Travis Street, Suite 1600
Houston, Texas 77002-2992
facsimile: (713) 227-9508

By Facsimile and EPA Pouch Mail:

Suzanne B. Murray
Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA, Region 6
Fountain Place, 12th Floor, Suite 1200
Mail Code 6RC
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
facsimile: (214) 665-2182

Richard Ossias
Associate General Counsel
Air and Radiation Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Mail Code 2344A
Washington, D.C. 20460-0001
facsimile: (202) 564-75603

                                                        Secretary
                                          -2-

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace