Los Mestenios Compressor Station (Board decision, April 9, 2010)

In re Los Mestenios Compressor Station (EAB CAA Appeal No. 09-01): petition dismissed with prejudice

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
CAA 09-01
Decided
April 9, 2010
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-03

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2010, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2010
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the permit proceeding. The Board approved Williams Four Corners, LLC's withdrawal of its petition for review and dismissed the petition with prejudice. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Williams Four Corners, LLC withdrew its petition challenging the Clean Air Act Title V permit for the Los Mestenios Compressor Station. The withdrawal followed negotiations with EPA Region 6, which proposed a revised permit and issued a final permit on April 1, 2010. The Environmental Appeals Board approved the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the order.
  • Outcome: The petition for review was dismissed with prejudice after the petitioner withdrew it.
  • Key point: The Board approved the petitioner's withdrawal after the Region issued a revised final permit.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

Filed

APR - 9 2010

Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
INITIALS [illegible]

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re:

Los Mestenios Compressor Station CAA Appeal No. 09-01

Permit No. R6-NM-04-09R1

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

On April 7, 2010, Williams Four Corners, LLC, withdrew its petition for review in the above-captioned matter. Petitioner stated that after negotiation between the parties, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 (“Region”) proposed a revised Clean Air Act Title V permit for the Los Mestenios facility, and issued a final permit for the Los Mestenios facility on April 1, 2010. Notice of Withdrawal of Petition for Review (April 7, 2010). For good cause shown, the Board approves Williams’ withdrawal of its petition, and the Board hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the petition in its entirety.

So ordered.

Dated: 4/9/2010 ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

By: Kathie A. Stein
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the matter of Los Mestenios Compressor Station, CAA Appeal No. 09-01, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By U.S. First Class Mail and Facsimile:

Kyle R. Beall
Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D’Armond, McCowan & Jarman, L.L.P.
One American Place
301 Main Street, Suite 1800
Baton Rouge, LA 70801
fax: (225) 215-4093

By EPA Pouch Mail and Facsimile:

Richard H. Bartley
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6
Office of Regional Counsel (6RC-D)
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75202
fax: (214) 665-2182

Date: APR 12 2010

Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace