Liston Brick Company (Board decision, March 18, 2008)
In re Liston Brick Company (EAB CAA Appeal No. 07-03): civil penalty modified after appeal withdrawal
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An Administrative Law Judge found Liston Brick Company liable for two violations of 40 C.F.R. part 63, subpart RRR, two violations of Clean Air Act section 114, and assessed a $116,402 civil administrative penalty. On appeal, Liston challenged the finding that its net worth exceeded one million dollars and sought a lower penalty. EPA Region 9 did not oppose reducing the penalty to $107,504.64, and Liston agreed to that amount. The Environmental Appeals Board granted Liston's motion to withdraw the appeal, dismissed the appeal with prejudice, and modified the penalty to $107,504.64, payable within 30 days of receipt of the final order.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. pt. 63, subpart RRR; 42 U.S.C. §§ 7412 and 7414; 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.31(c) and 1.25(e)(1).
- Outcome: The appeal was dismissed with prejudice, and the civil penalty was modified from $116,402 to $107,504.64.
- Key point: The Board entered a reduced penalty after the petitioner withdrew its appeal and EPA agreed to the reduction.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BO
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
|'|ARI s n08
In re:
ListonBrick Co. CAA AppealNo. 07-03
DocketNo. CAA-09-2005-00
II
FINAL ORDER
On January16,2008,ListonBrick Company("Liston")filed a noticeof appeal from an
Initial Decisionissuedby AdministrativeLaw JudgeBarbaraA. Gunning('ALJ'), alongwith a
motionseekinga thirty-dayextensionof time to file an appellatebrief. "Noticeof Appeal
Filed With Motion for Extensionof Timeto File Appellant Brief." TheInitial
[Concurrently
DecisionfoundListonliablefor two violationsof 40 C.F.R.part 63, subpartRRR Q.{ational
EmissionStandards
for Hazardous
Air Pollutantsfor Secondary
AluminumProduction)and
section112of the CleanAir Act, 42 U.S.C.g 7412. In addition,the ALJ foundListonliablefor
two violationsof Section114of the CleanAir Act, 42 U.S.C.$ 7414,for failing to complywith
requests
for information.For theseviolationstheALJ assessed penaltyof
a civil administrative
$116,402.By orderdatedJanuary18,2008,theBoardgrantedListon'smotionfor anextension
of time to file its appellatebrief. SeeOrderExtendingTimeto File AppellateBrief (Jan.18,
2008). Liston filed its appellatebrief on February19,2008. SeeRespondent's
Appealof the
Initial Decisionof thePresidingOfficer(Feb.19,2008)("Appeal").
a
On appeal,ListonarguesthattheALJ erredin concludingthatListon'snetworth
exceeded
onemillion dollars.Appealat 2. Accordingto Liston,the evidencein the recorddoes
not supporthis conclusionand,asa result,Listonarguesthatthepenaltyshouldbe reducedfrom
1o107,504.64.
$116,402 "Region"),the
Id.at7l. Inresponse,U.S.EPARegiong(the
complainant
in this matter,statesthatit "doesnot oppose[Liston's]prayerfor relief of a penalty
amountof $107,504.64
in orderto expeditiously
resolvethis litigation." Non-Opposition
to
Appealofthe Initial Decisionof thePresidingOfficerat 2 (Feb.28, 2008)('Non-Opposition").
TheRegionrequests
thatthis Boardissuea final orderrequiringListonto pay a civil penalty of
$107,504.64.
Id.
In a response
filed on March 13,2008,Listonstatesthat"it concurswith the Region's
Non-Opposition"
andthat"[t]he thepartiesarein agreement
regardingthe amountofthe penalty
andseeka final order-" Respondent's
Response
to Region'sNon-Opposition(Mar. 13,2008)
("Response").In conjunctionwith its Response.
Liston hasfiled a motionto withdrawits appeal.
Respondent's
Motion to WithdrawAppeal(Mar. 13,2008)("Motion").
Underthesecircumstances,
Liston'smotionis granted. Liston'sappealbeforethis Board
is herebydismissedwith prejudice.Further,thepenaltyassessed
in the Initial Decisionis
modifiedasfollows. Listonshallpayacivil penaltyin the amountof $107,504.64
within thirty
(30)daysofreceiptofthis FinalOrder. Paymentshallbe madeby forwardinga cashier'sor
certifiedcheckpayableto the Treasurer,
UnitedStatesof America,at the following address:
3
U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency
'
FinesandPenalties
CincinnatiFinanceCenter
P.O.Box979077
St.Louis,MO 63197-9000
A transmittalletter identifying the casenameandthe EPA docketnumbermust accompanythe
check.40C.F.R.g 22.31(c)
So ordered.r
Dated:
ENVIRONMENTALAPPEALSBOARD
aut,t{, Zto/
Y,t,t
r Thetwo-member paneldecidingthis matteris comprisedof Environmental
AppealsJudges
KathieA. SteinandAnnaL. Wolgast.40 C.F.R.g 1.25(eX1).
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I herebycertifythatcopiesof the foregoingFinal Orderin the matterofListon Brick
Company,CAA AppealNo. 07-03,weresentto the followingpersonsin tlremannerindicated:
By FirstClassMail:
BrendanBrandt
ErikaD. BaileyDrake
Varner & Brandt,LLP
3750UniversityAve, Suite610
Riverside,CA 92501
By PouchMail:
DanielReich(ORC-2)
Officeof RegionalCounsel
U.S.EPARegion9
. 75 HawthorneStreet
SanFrancisco,CA 94105
DavidKim (ORC-2)
Officeof RegionalCounsel
U.S.EPARegion9
75 HawthorneStreet
SanFrancisco,CA 94105
DanielleCarr
RegionalHearingClerk
U.S.EPARegion9
75 HawthorneStreet
SanFrancisco,CA 94105
By Inter-OfficeMail:
tr,;AHI S O0S
GaryJonesi(2241A)
Officeof Civil Enforcement
Dated: [illegible]
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace