Animal Feeding Operations (Board decision, December 12, 2006)
In re Animal Feeding Operations (EAB CAA 06-2468C thru 06-2618C, CERCLA 06-2468C thru 06-2618C, and EPCRA 06-2468C thru 06-2618C): 52 consent agreements ratified
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2006, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance submitted 52 Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for animal feeding operations. The agreements addressed potential liabilities under the Clean Air Act, CERCLA, and EPCRA and were part of EPA's nationwide animal feeding operations initiative. The Environmental Appeals Board ratified the agreements and ordered each listed respondent to comply with the agreement terms. Each respondent was assessed the civil penalty determined under paragraph 48, with the penalty calculation tables included in the order's attachment. The Board also noted that the submission separately requested changes to 186 previously approved agreements, including nine requested vacaturs, but said those matters would be addressed in a separate order.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.18(b)(3), 22.18(b), and 22.4(a); 42 U.S.C. §§ 7413, 9609, and 11045
- Outcome: Fifty-two Consent Agreements were ratified, compliance was ordered, and the paragraph-48 civil penalties were assessed.
- Key point: The EAB ratified a large group of animal feeding operations settlements under the same consent-agreement and penalty framework it had previously approved.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
)
In re: ) Consent Agreement and
) Final Order
Consent Agreements and Proposed ) CAA-HQ-2005-xx Final Orders for Animal Feeding ) CERCLA-HQ-2005-xx Operations ) EPCRA-HQ-2005-xx
FINAL ORDER
I. BACKGROUND
On December 6, 2006, the Environmental Appeals Board
("Board") received for review and ratification fifty-two Consent
Agreements and Proposed Final Orders ("Agreements")¹ from the
EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ("OECA",
also referred to as "Complainant") in accordance with 40 C.F.R.
§ 22.18(b)(3) of the Consolidated Rules of Practice Governing the
Administrative Assessment of Civil Penalties and the
Revocation/Termination
or Suspension of Permits, 40 C.F.R. pt. 22
The Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
provided a list of the fifty-two companies (or "Respondents") that entered into these Agreements. See Attachment A to Memorandum from Granta Y. Nakayama on Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding Operations to Environmental Appeals Board (December 6, 2006). This attachment has been incorporated into this Order as Attachment 1. This Order applies to all the Respondents listed in the Attachment.
The same submittal also requested that the Board approve
changes made to one hundred and eighty-six Agreements previously approved, including vacating nine of those Agreements. Id. The Board will rule on these Agreements in a separate order. ("Part 22").² These Agreements are part of a large group of
proposed agreements EPA has received in response to a nationwide
offer EPA made to animal feeding operations ("AFOs") in the egg,
broiler, chicken, turkey, dairy, and swine industries that meet
the definition of an AFO under the Clean Water Act. See Animal
Feeding Operations Consent Agreement and Final Order, 70 Fed.
Reg. 4958, 4959 (Jan. 31, 2005).
EPA offered AFOs the opportunity to sign consent agreements
to resolve potential liabilities under the Clean Air Act ("CAA"),
CAA § § 101-618, 42 U.S.C § § 7401-7671q, the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
("CERCLA"), CERCLA § § 101-405, 42 U.S.C. § § 9601-967, and the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act ("EPCRA),
EPCRA § § 301-330, 42 U.S.C. § § 1101-11050. See Animal Feeding
Operations Consent Agreement and Final Order, 70 Fed. Reg. 4958
(Jan. 31, 2005); see also Animal Feeding Operations Consent
Agreement and Final Order, 70 Fed. Reg. 40016 (July 12, 2005).
According to section 22.18 (b)(3), settlements or consent
agreements arising from proceedings commenced at EPA Headquarters need the Board's approval before becoming final Agency action. 40 C.F.R. § 22.18 (b)(3) ('No settlement or consent agreement shall dispose of any proceeding under these Consolidated Rules of Practice without a final order from * * *, in a proceeding commenced at EPA Headquarters, the Environmental Appeals Board, ratifying the parties' consent agreement."). See also id.
§ 22.4(a) (\TheEnvironmental Appeals Board * * * approves settlements of proceedings under these Consolidated Rules of Practice commenced at EPA Headquarters"). Under the model agreement published in the January 31, 2005
Federal Register notice, participating AFOs will pay a civil
penalty based on the number and size of the farms and the number
of animals at each AFO covered by the Agreement, in accordance
with a table set forth therein. Participating AFOs would also
share responsibility for funding a two-year nationwide emissions
monitoring study aimed at the development of methodologies for
estimating emissions from AFOs, which in turn would be used to
determine participating companies' regulatory status and
compliance under the CAA, CERCLA, and EPCRA. As part of the
Agreements, the companies would receive a release and covenant
not to sue for potential civil violations of specified
requirements of these statutes that may have already occurred or
that may occur during the study period.
This is the seventh group of Agreements the Board has
received for review and ratification under this initiative. The
first group consisted of twenty Agreements, which, after careful
examination,⁴
the Board ratified by Final Order dated January 27,
On November 18, 2005, after a preliminary examination of
the first group of Agreements and the supporting documentation OECA submitted, the Board issued an order identifying various areas that needed clarification and requesting OECA to file a supplemental memorandum answering several questions. The Board also scheduled a hearing inviting OECA and any interested Respondents to address the areas identified in the order. See Order Scheduling Hearing and Requesting Supplemental Information
(continued.. . )
2006. See Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for
Animal Feeding Operations (EAB, Jan. 27, 2006). In its review of
the first twenty Agreements, the Board found that : (1) the
Agreements were administrative penalty orders subject to Board
review; (2) the Agreements did not violate the Clean Air Act or
Part 22; and (3) the penalty amounts set forth in the Agreements
followed the applicable statutory penalty criteria and any
deviations from EPA's penalty policies were appropriately
explained. Id. 8-34. After the first group of twenty
Agreements, the Board has received six additional groups of
varying numbers of Agreements for Board ratification. On April
17, 2006, the Board ratified the second group of Agreements,
consisting of seven hundred and two Agreements. See Consent
3 ( . . .continued)
(EAB, Nov. 18, 2005). On December 6, 2005, the Board received a joint request from various community and environmental groups (collectively referred to as "AIR), seeking, among other things, to file a memorandum to respond to OECA1s supplemental brief and asking to participate at the hearing. By order dated December 8, 2005, the Board granted AIR the opportunity to participate at the hearing. See Order Granting Opportunity to Participate at Hearing and Allocating Time (EAB, Dec. 8, 2005). By a separate order, the Board allowed AIR to file a non-party brief. See Order Denying Motion for Leave to Intervene (EAB, Dec. 8, 2005).
The Board held the hearing on December 13, 2005. OECA,
counsel for six of the Respondents, and AIR participated at the hearing. On December 20, 2005, AIR filed a non-party brief responding to OECA1s supplemental brief. On January 6, 2006, OECA and Respondents each filed a response brief to AIR'S non- party brief. Upon consideration of all responsive filings, the Board issued a Final Order on January 27, 2006, ratifying the Agreements . Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding
Operations (EAB, Apr. 17, 2006). The third group, consisting of
two hundred eighty-six Agreements, was ratified on May 5, 2006.
See Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal
Feeding Operations (EAB, May 5, 2006). The fourth group,
consisting of one thousand two hundred and five Agreements, was
ratified by the Board on July 19, 2006. See Consent Agreements
and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding Operations (EAB,
July 19, 2006). The fifth group, consisting of three hundred and
fifty-three Agreements, was ratified on August 7, 2006. See
Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding
Operations (EAB, Aug. 7, 2006). On August 16, 2006, the Board
received the sixth group, which consisted of two Agreements. The
Board ratified these two Agreements in separate orders; one order
was issued on August 17, 2006, see Consent Agreement and Proposed
Final Order for Animal Feeding Operations - Foster Brothers Farm,
Inc. (EAB, Aug. 17, 2006), the other one was issued on August 21,
2006, see Consent Agreement and Proposed Final Order for Animal
Feeding Operations - Seaboard Farms LP (EAB, Aug. 21, 2006).
Currently, the Board has ratified a total of two thousand five
hundred and sixty-eight final Agreements. The discussion and
findings in these earlier orders apply with equal force to these
Agreements as well.
In its transmittal memorandum, OECA represents that the
Agreements in this current group are identical to the agreements
previously ratified by the Board, the model agreement published
in the January 31, 2005 Federal Register notice, and the sample
Agreement attached to its transmittal memorandum.~The
transmittal memorandum further states that each penalty assessed
by the Agreements is in accordance with the formula established
in Paragraph 48 of the model agreement.5
Upon review, the Board hereby issues the following order.
II. F I N A L ORDER
Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(b), the Board issues this
Final Order ratifying the Agreement executed by the Complainant
and each Respondent listed in Attachment 1 to this Order as
submitted to the Board by Complainant on December 6, 2006.
Complainant and Respondent have consented to the entry of this
Memorandum on Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders
for Animal Feeding Operations from Granta Y. Nakayama to Environmental Appeals Board (December 6, 2006) at 4.
Id. The Board has previously found that this paragraph is
consistent with all applicable statutory penalty criteria and that any deviations from applicable penalty policies are appropriate. See Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding Operations (EAB, Jan. 27, 2006) at 25-34. Final Order and have agreed to comply with the Agreement. It is
hereby ORDERED that:
1. Respondent shall comply with all the terms of the
Agreement, incorporated herein by reference;
2. Nothing in the Agreement relieves Respondent from
otherwise complying with the applicable requirements set forth in
the CAA, CERCLA, and EPCRA;
1
3. Respondent is hereby assessed a civil penalty in the sum
of the amount determined by Paragraph 48 of the Agreement;
4. Respondent shall, within thirty (30) days of the date an
executed copy of the Agreement is received by the Respondent,
forward a certified check or money order, payable to the United
States Treasurer, in the amount determined by Paragraph 48 of the
Agreement to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(Washington, D.C. Hearing Clerk)
Docket No. [insert Respondent's case docket number]
P.O. Box 360277
Pittsburgh, PA 15251-6277
The check or money order shall bear the notation of the name
of the Respondent and the appropriate case docket number. A transmittal letter, indicating Respondent's name, complete
address, and the case docket number must accompany the payment.
Respondent shall file a copy of the check and the transmittal
letter by mailing the copies to:
U.S. Mail Address
Office of Hearing Clerk
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
MC 1900L
Washington, D.C. 20460-0001
Courier/FedEx Address
U.S. EPA Office of the Hearing Clerk
1099 14th Street, N.W.
Suite 350, Franklin Court
Washington, D.C. 20005
5. Failure to remit the civil penalty assessed under the
Agreement may subject the Respondent to civil action pursuant to
section 113 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7413, section 109 of CERCLA,
42 U.S.C. § 9609, and/or section 325 of EPCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 11045,
to collect any unpaid portion of the monies owed, together with
the interest, handling charges, enforcement expenses, including
attorney fees and nonpayment penalties set forth in Paragraphs 51
and 52 of the Agreement;
6. With respect to all requirements of the Agreement except
for those related to the assessment and payment of penalties in
Paragraphs 48-52, failure to comply with these other requirements will void the releases and covenants not to sue granted by the
Agreement as provided for in Paragraph 37 of the Agreement;
7. Complainant is ordered to serve each of the Respondents
listed in Attachment 1. Complainant shall submit to the Board a
certificate of service confirming that such service has been
made.
So ordered.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
Dated: 12/12/06 Edward E. Reich
Environmental Appeals Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Final Order in
the matter of Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding Operations, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:
By Interoffice Mail
(and copy by facsimile) : Robert A. Kaplan
Bruce Fergusson
Tim Sullivan
Special Litigation & Projects
Division
Office of Civil Enforcement(2248-A)
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20460
FAX: (202) 564-0010
Secretary
Attachment 1
Business Confidentiality Asserted¹
Penalty Calculation Table for 52 Respondents
Business Confidentiality Asserted'
Penalty Calculation Table for 52 Respondents
pee i oe ee | com | ome | ove1| | Penalty|
Ce cate oe eho 20 |e UT eo | ee | ae [aa (ns)
| 2699 |KDFarms [28400 4t0thst. [Rolfe, A50581— J A | P2000
| 2701 |BremcoFarms 07914 Co Road. 66A [New Bremen, OH 45869 | OH [ [T2000
| 2702 |DRSG Partnership | 15959 730th Street—[Cresco, A52136 | A TT 00
| 2703 [Paris Foods, Inc. —*|15002 140th Street [Cresco, AS21396 | A [T3000
[27047 |Meirek Enterprises ULC [3324 100m St___[Protivin, 62165 | A_| [| | | | — 00]
|2705 [QuiveraPork [312 NorthB Street_[Washington, KS 66068 [ KS [200
2706 [Rolling Hills Pork [312 North B Street_ | Washington, KS 66068 [KS [600]
[itor [Ransss Sele! Pont —|ste Nert'B Srect—— [washer RS eevee [ke [- | boo a eT
| 2741 |Ilini Hi-Tech, Inc. [17469 Baseline Road [Kingston 160745 Te [ees [i500]
| 2712 [Flecha Dairy [PO Box 460 Dexter, NM 88230 NM J 500
[2715 [Rindler Farm [1480 Wourms Rd,____ Ft. Recovery, OH 46846| OH | || | | 600]
| 2716 [S&JFarmCom. ([8617ESR26 Portland, IN47377 | IN TT T5000)
| 2717 [MurcrestFarms, LLC [31721NYSRt12__ [Copenhagen NY 13626 | Ny [ [TT 200
| 2718 |EdealDairy [147 AEdealRoad |Lostunas, NMe703T | NM[ TT 000
2720 |Patterson Farms, Inc. [Townline Road |Auburn, NY 13021 NY
| 2725 [Stokes McKoy Farm [4175 HoneycuttRoad|[Salemburg, NC 28385 | NC [TT 500
| 2728 |Heritage Dairy 650CRF Clovis, NMB101 NM PO 00}
| 2729 [StarerFarmsinc. [PO Box85 __|Hofiman, MNS6330_ | MN [TTT T2000]
| 2730 [Diller Pullet Farm [872 Union CityRd [Ft Recovery, OH 45846 | OH [TT 200
|2731 IA Quality Pullets, LLP [4275 225th Avenue [Sioux Rapids A50585 | IA [TT 500}
[27348 [Edi Sciiattersasssemmeens| 12647/SR(69 aes [Paulding 1 OH 4507.0 eens | Olle [seu eeeeen | sumeeeeery| eueeeeee |emeees|e881200|
| 2736 |M-MSwineLLC [2302 RiverRoad [Algona AS50517 | A [TT 5 00)
| 2737 [Daybreak Foods, Inc. |P.0.Box800 [Lake Mills, wis3551 | Wh [T3500]
= [_2738 [Tim Friedman Farm [5453 Vine Street [Dubois IN47527 TIN [TT 500)
=
5
is
3 Sanitized ‘Information contained in the Number of Farms columns has been claimed CBI by the Respondents and has been removed. page 1 of 2 Ed
=
Business Confidentiality Asserted"
Penalty Calculation Table for 52 Respondents
i se a ee
Pe ee eee
ee ae ee
Ue a oe ee
Linn Grove Pulleis Ino [876 440th Street rrr——<“i—esO—OSOC—S—SCSsMshsTeshs_eseeese 5135 Live Oak Hog 2747__|Ernest Byrd Hog Farm Company Road Pink Hill, NC 28572, NC 200) 2748_[Sperry Farms, Inc. 11420 Sperry Road Atlantic, PA 16111 [PA| | || | 1000] DeGroot Dairy (Barnes II
2749 |Dairy) 5520 W Delaware Avenue|Visalia, CA 93291 CA
[Stephenson Hog Farm [3794 Hwy. 90 Vienna, GA 31092 [GA 200)
2746_ [Maple Brook Farms, LLC |19646 SR 292 Ridgeway, OH 43345 | OH} |_| | | —200|
2750 1352 250th Street Webster City, AS50595 [A [T7500] Daybreak Dail PO Box 170 Mesquite, NM 88048) 2) John Fortkamp 14574 State Rt.49 Ft.Recovery,OH45846 | OH|{ | | SCT SCT S500}
2753 _|Appell Dair 2602 Knox Road 1900 E Altona, IL 61414 ee |e 500) Sanitized ‘Information contained in the Number of Farms columns has been claimed CBI by the Respondents and has been removed. page 2 of 2
Penalty Calculation Table for 52 Respondents‘
Le ae ae
a ee ee a
Pe ee ee
[egiet| RespondentName | Addiess | City State.2ip, Stato) 280% [rmeamtsul tage | Te "ng bed ee ee Ue oe a si aa 13859 Roberts Road [Sunbury, OH 43074 oH fT 200 (Girard Bros LLC 13359 P Road Osceola, NE 68651 EE Ee) Eee) eee ee Be) IDan and Peggy Comstock 21779 Hwy MM. Versailles, MO 65084 IMO [| if | { ‘4{ 200; ILWN Properties, L.P. P.O. Box 1285 Manhattan, KS 66505 a
[2721 |Welch Farm 10088 New Hope Rd.|Galt, CA 95632 Cl es [2] 1000} Rover's Farm inc. [396 North Farm Rd. [Chazy, NY 12927 A | | Lloyd Brabacker 561 Brown Rd Meyerstown, PA 17087|PA_| | 1| | 1} 509] ("2724 [Adam Robson Farm 711554 Pucker Street [Niles, MI 49120, i =) a a ee 2726_[Van Eaton Pork 3369 DeltaAvenue [Prescott, IA 50859 AT 500)
[Sunrise Farms-Ken Beers 1236 Newport Rd uricarimnons Ati 020 cases) Ae | areca | cece m0] | ee | e500}
[Wuebker Farm 2129 Wuebker Road [Maria Stein,OH45860 [OH | | Saf S|, St = Ed Raszkowski 7499 E. 1000N. [Union City, IN 47390 wf ff
: The Pullet Connection, Inc. [28595 703th Avenue _|Danube, MN 56230 [MAN | eee yt 500} Jerry Post Pullets 2758 Fox Road Fort Recovery, OH 45846 [OH [| 1] | 1] 500] 11/15/2006 ‘Information contained in the Number of Farms columns has not been claimed CBI by the Respondents. page 1 of 1
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace