Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding Operations (Board decision, January 7, 2009)

In re Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding Operations (EAB CAA, CERCLA, and EPCRA appeals): seven agreements vacated

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
CAA 06-2112C, CAA 06-2464C, CERCLA 06-2112C, CERCLA 06-2464C, EPCRA 06-2112C, EPCRA 06-2464C
Decided
January 7, 2009
Outcome
Citations vacated
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-25

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2009, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2009
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board Order Supplementing Order Vacating Consent Agreements and Final Orders is a final disposition concerning seven animal-feeding-operation consent agreements. The Board vacated the agreements and their corresponding Final Orders because EPA represented that they duplicated previously approved agreements. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA offered animal feeding operations an opportunity to resolve potential liabilities under the Clean Air Act, CERCLA, and EPCRA through consent agreements and Final Orders. The Board had already vacated seventeen agreements in an October 24, 2008 order. EPA later identified seven additional agreements that had been omitted from that order and represented that they duplicated previously approved agreements. The Board vacated those seven agreements and their corresponding Final Orders, and ordered EPA to serve the affected respondents and file a certificate of service.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 42 U.S.C. § 7401; 42 U.S.C. § 9601; 42 U.S.C. § 11001
  • Outcome: The seven identified consent agreements and corresponding Final Orders were vacated.
  • Key point: The Board vacated duplicate consent agreements and Final Orders that had been omitted from an earlier vacatur order.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re: ) Consent Agreement and
) Final Order
Consent Agreements and Proposed ) CAA-HQ-2005-xx
Final Orders for Animal Feeding ) CERCLA-HQ-2005-xx
Operations ) EPCRA-HQ-2005-xx

ORDER SUPPLEMENTING
ORDER VACATING CONSENT AGREEMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS

I. BACKGROUND

On October 24, 2008, the Environmental Appeals Board (“Board”) issued an order vacating seventeen of the two thousand six hundred and twenty Consent Agreements (“Agreements”) the Board has ratified in the above-captioned matter.1 The following Consent Agreements should have been included in that order but were inadvertently omitted:2 (1) Hansen Farms L.C. (Docket No. 0544); (2) Crown Farm Partners I, Inc. (Docket No. 0555); (3) Tower Farms, Inc. (Docket No. 0699); (4) Adwell Farms, Inc. (Docket No. 0704); (5) Prism Pork, Inc. (Docket No. 0709); (6) Spartan Farms, Inc. (Docket No. 0728); and (7) Neil Zwart Dairy (Docket No. 0968).

In its October 16, 2008 memorandum requesting that the Board vacate various of the Agreements, EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (“OECA”) represents that the above-mentioned Agreements are duplicates of previously approved Agreements, and requests that they be vacated.

II. ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Board hereby VACATES the above-mentioned Agreements and their corresponding Final Orders.

1 These Agreements are part of a large group of proposed agreements EPA has received in response to a nationwide offer EPA made to animal feeding operations (“AFOs”) in the egg, broiler, chicken, turkey, dairy, and swine industries that meet the definition of an AFO under the Clean Water Act. See Animal Feeding Operations Consent Agreement and Final Order, 70 Fed. Reg. 4958, 4959 (Jan. 31, 2005). EPA offered AFOs the opportunity to sign consent agreements to resolve potential liabilities under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), CAA §§ 101-618, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), CERCLA §§ 101-405, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675, and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (“EPCRA”), EPCRA §§ 301-330, 42 U.S.C. §§ 11001-11050. See Animal Feeding Operations Consent Agreement and Final Order, 70 Fed. Reg. 4958 (Jan. 31, 2005); see also Animal Feeding Operations Consent Agreement and Final Order, 70 Fed. Reg. 40016 (July 12, 2005).

2 On October 16, 2008, the Board received a memorandum from the EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (“OECA”) requesting it to vacate twenty-four of the Agreements. See Memorandum from Granta Y. Nakayama on Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding Operations to Environmental Appeals Board (Oct. 16, 2008). The Board's October 24, 2008 order covered seventeen of these agreements.

Complainant is ordered to serve each of the above-mentioned Respondents. Complainant shall submit to the Board a certificate of service confirming that such service has been made.

So ordered.

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

By: Edward E. Reich
Environmental Appeals Judge

Dated: 1/7/09

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Supplementing Order Vacating Agreements and Final Orders in the matter of Consent Agreements and Proposed Final Orders for Animal Feeding Operations, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Interoffice Mail
(and copy by facsimile):

Bernadette Rappold
Tim Sullivan
Special Litigation & Projects Division
Office of Civil Enforcement (2248-A)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20460

FAX: (202) 564-0010

Dated: JAN -7 2009

Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace