Lottie M. Burgess (on behalf of and survivor of Ozie E. Burgess) v. Apogee Coal Company LLC (Board decision, June 23, 2026)

Burgess v. Apogee Coal (BRB 24-0131 and 25-0016): Trust Fund directed to pay benefits

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
25-0016 BLA, 24-0131 BLA
Decided
June 23, 2026
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-07

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2026 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. The Benefits Review Board dismissed both appeals and remanded the claims to the district director for payment by the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund. Under 20 C.F.R. § 802.406, a Board decision becomes final 60 days after issuance unless a timely petition for judicial review or a timely request for Board reconsideration is filed. A party may request Board reconsideration within 30 days under 20 C.F.R. § 802.407.

Plain-English summary

Lottie Burgess pursued black lung benefit claims on behalf of, and as survivor of, Ozie Burgess. The Board dismissed Apogee Coal and its insurer from payment responsibility after a federal appeals court ruling about Arch Resources' liability as a self-insurer. The Director of the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs did not oppose entitlement. The Board dismissed both appeals and directed the district director to pay benefits from the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Trust Fund payment under 26 U.S.C. § 9501(d)(1)(B).
  • Outcome: Both appeals dismissed; claims returned for Trust Fund payment.
  • Key point: Apogee Coal was dismissed from payment responsibility, and the Trust Fund must pay the benefits.

Full text (BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor
Benefits Review Board
200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB Nos. 24-0131 BLA and 25-0016 BLA
Case Nos. 2022-BLA-05326 and 2024-BLA-05535

LOTTIE M. BURGESS
)
(o/b/o and survivor of OZIE E. BURGESS) ) )
Claimant-Respondent
)
)
v. )

APOGEE COAL COMPANY LLC
)
)
NOT-PUBLISHED
)
and
)
) DATE ISSUED: 06/23/2026
Self-Insured Through ARCH RESOURCES
)
)
Employer/Carrier-
)
Respondents
)
)
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’
)
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
)
)
Party-in-Interest
)
ORDER
On October 1, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, within whose jurisdiction this case arises, held in Hobet Mining, Inc. v. Director, OWCP [Meredith], 156 F.4th 385 (4th Cir. 2025), reh’g denied (Mar. 16, 2026), that Arch Coal Company, Inc. (Arch), 1 the parent company of Hobet Mining, Inc. (Hobet Mining) could 0F

not be held liable as a self-insurer for the payment of benefits arising out of a miner’s employment with Arch’s former subsidiaries, including Hobet Mining, when Patriot Coal,

1
Arch Coal, Inc., is also known as Arch Resources. Arch has merged with CONSOL Energy and is now known as Core Natural Resources. Employer’s Motion to Dismiss at 1 n.1; Employer’s Opposition to the Director’s Mot. at 1 n.1. the subsequent owner and self-insurer of Hobet Mining at the time the claim was filed, went bankrupt. The parties agree that Meredith controls these cases.

On October 14, 2025, Core Natural Resources filed a motion to dismiss Apogee Coal Company LLC (Employer), as self-insured through Arch Resources, as the responsible operator and the responsible insurer in these cases pursuant to Meredith. On April 7, 2026, the Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (the Director), filed a motion to hold the appeal in these cases in abeyance until Meredith is not subject to further appeal.

On June 8, 2026, the Benefits Review Board issued an Order denying the Director’s motion to hold the appeal in these cases in abeyance, granted Employer’s motion to dismiss it as the responsible operator, and ordered the Director to inform the Board within seven days whether he elects to contest entitlement in these cases. See 20 C.F.R.
§§725.414(a)(3)(iii), 725.497(d). In a June 10, 2026 response to the Board’s Order, the Director states he does not oppose Claimant’s entitlement to benefits.

In view of the above, the Board dismisses these appeals and remands these cases to the district director for the payment of benefits by the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund. See 26 U.S.C. §9501(d)(1)(B); 20 C.F.R. §725.1(c), (e).

SO ORDERED.

DANIEL T. GRESH, Chief
Administrative Appeals Judge

JONATHAN ROLFE
Administrative Appeals Judge

GLENN E. ULMER
Administrative Appeals Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace