Mary Maynard (on behalf of and widow of Robert Maynard) v. Apogee Coal Company, LLC (Board decision, June 16, 2026)
Maynard v. Apogee Coal (BRB 24-0233 and 24-0234): Trust Fund directed to pay benefits
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2026 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.
BRB final decision. The Benefits Review Board dismissed both appeals and remanded the claims to the district director for payment by the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund. Under 20 C.F.R. § 802.406, a Board decision becomes final 60 days after issuance unless a timely petition for judicial review or a timely request for Board reconsideration is filed. A party may request Board reconsideration within 30 days under 20 C.F.R. § 802.407.
Plain-English summary
Mary Maynard pursued black lung benefit claims on behalf of, and as survivor of, Robert Maynard. After a federal appeals court ruling on Arch Resources' liability as a self-insurer, the Board dismissed Apogee Coal and Arch from payment responsibility. The Director of the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs did not oppose entitlement. The Board dismissed both appeals and directed the district director to pay benefits from the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Trust Fund payment under 26 U.S.C. § 9501(d)(1)(B).
- Outcome: Both appeals dismissed; claims returned for Trust Fund payment.
- Key point: Apogee Coal and Arch were dismissed from payment responsibility, and the Trust Fund must pay the benefits.
Full text (BRB public release)
U.S. Department of Labor
Benefits Review Board
200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001
BRB Nos. 24-0233 BLA and 24-0234 BLA
Case Nos. 2021-BLA-05981 and 2022-BLA-05204
MARY MAYNARD
)
(o/b/o and Widow of ROBERT MAYNARD)
)
)
Claimant-Respondent
)
)
v. )
)
APOGEE COAL COMPANY LLC
)
)
NOT-PUBLISHED
and
)
)
Self-Insured Through ARCH RESOURCES
) DATE ISSUED: 06/16/2026
)
Employer/Carrier-
)
Petitioners
)
)
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’
)
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
)
)
Party-in-Interest
)
ORDER
On October 1, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, within whose jurisdiction this case arises, held in Hobet Mining, Inc. v. Director, OWCP [Meredith], 156 F.4th 385 (4th Cir. 2025), reh’g denied (Mar. 16, 2026), that Arch Coal Company, Inc. (Arch), 1 the parent company of Hobet Mining, Inc. (Hobet Mining), could 0F
not be held liable as a self-insurer for the payment of benefits arising out of a miner’s employment with Arch’s former subsidiaries, including Hobet Mining, when Patriot Coal,
1
Arch Coal, Inc., is also known as Arch Resources. Arch has merged with CONSOL Energy and is now known as Core Natural Resources. Employer’s Motion to Dismiss at 1 n.2. the subsequent owner and self-insurer of Hobet Mining at the time the claim was filed, went bankrupt. The parties agree that Meredith controls this case.
On October 15, 2025, Core Natural Resources filed a motion to dismiss Apogee Coal Company and Arch (Employer) as the responsible operator in this case pursuant to Meredith. On April 7, 2026, the Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (the Director), filed a motion to hold the appeal in this case in abeyance until Meredith is not subject to further appeal.
On June 3, 2026, the Benefits Review Board issued an Order denying the Director’s motion to hold the appeal in this case in abeyance, granted Employer’s motion to dismiss it as the responsible operator, and ordered the Director to inform the Board within seven days whether he elects to contest entitlement in this case.
See 20 C.F.R.
§§725.414(a)(3)(iii), 725.497(d). In a June 9, 2026 response to the Board’s Order, the Director states he does not oppose Claimant’s entitlement to benefits.
In view of the above, the Board dismisses this appeal and remands this case to the district director for the payment of benefits by the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund. See 26 U.S.C. §9501(d)(1)(B); 20 C.F.R. §725.1(c), (e).
2
SO ORDERED.
DANIEL T. GRESH, Chief
Administrative Appeals Judge
JONATHAN ROLFE
Administrative Appeals Judge
GLENN E. ULMER
Administrative Appeals Judge
3
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace