Richard Ward v. Consolidation Coal Company (Board decision, December 14, 2021)

Ward v. Consolidation Coal (BRB 21-0178 BLA): benefit start date corrected

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
21-0178 BLA
Decided
December 14, 2021
Outcome
Modified
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-22

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2021 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. This unpublished decision is not precedent. The Benefits Review Board affirmed Richard Ward's black lung benefit award but changed the payment start date from April 2016 to January 2017. Under 20 C.F.R. § 802.406, a Board decision becomes final 60 days after issuance unless a timely petition for judicial review or reconsideration is filed. A party may request Board reconsideration within 30 days under 20 C.F.R. § 802.407.

Plain-English summary

An administrative law judge awarded Richard Ward black lung benefits after finding complicated pneumoconiosis from coal mine work. The employer did not challenge entitlement, only the start date. The judge had said the disease's onset date could not be established and that benefits should begin when Ward filed his claim in January 2017. His order instead printed April 2016 as the start date. Both parties agreed this was an error, and the Board corrected the date to January 2017 while affirming the award.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: The complicated pneumoconiosis presumption under 30 U.S.C. § 921(c)(3) and benefit commencement under 20 C.F.R. § 725.503(b).
  • Outcome: Benefit award affirmed as modified; payments start in January 2017.
  • Key point: The printed April 2016 start date conflicted with the judge's finding that benefits began in the month the claim was filed.

Full text (DOL BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor Benefits Review Board 200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB No. 21-0178 BLA

RICHARD WARD
)
)
Claimant-Respondent
)
)
v. )
)
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
)
)
and
)
)
SELF-INSURED THROUGH CONSOL
) DATE ISSUED: 12/14/2021
ENERGY, INCORPORATED
)
)
Employer/Carrier-Petitioner )
)
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’
)
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
)
)
Party-in-Interest
) DECISION and ORDER

Appeal of Decision and Order Awarding Benefits of Richard M. Clark, Administrative Law Judge, United States Department of Labor.

Joseph E. Wolfe and Brad A. Austin (Wolfe Williams & Reynolds), Norton, Virginia, for Claimant.

Jeffrey R. Soukup (Jackson Kelly PLLC), Lexington, Kentucky, for Employer.

Before: BOGGS, Chief Administrative Appeals Judge, ROLFE and JONES, Administrative Appeals Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Employer appeals Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Richard M. Clark’s Decision and Order Awarding Benefits (2019-BLA-05561) rendered on a claim filed on January 26, 2017, pursuant to the Black Lung Benefits Act, as amended, 30 U.S.C. §§901-944 (2018) (Act).

The ALJ credited Claimant with 36.65 years of coal mine employment and found he has complicated pneumoconiosis, thereby invoking the irrebuttable presumption of total disability due to pneumoconiosis at Section 411(c)(3) of the Act. 30 U.S.C. §921(c)(3); 20 C.F.R. §718.304. The ALJ further found Claimant’s complicated pneumoconiosis arose out of his coal mine employment and awarded benefits. 20 C.F.R. §718.203(b). He set the date benefits commence as April 2016.

On appeal, Employer contends the ALJ erred in setting the commencement date for benefits.1 Claimant responds, agreeing with Employer the ALJ erred in determining the commencement date. The Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, has declined to respond to Employer’s appeal, unless requested to do so.

The Benefit Review Board’s scope of review is defined by statute. We must affirm the ALJ’s Decision and Order if it is rational, supported by substantial evidence, and in accordance with applicable law.2 33 U.S.C. §921(b)(3), as incorporated by 30 U.S.C.
§932(a); O’Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Assocs., Inc., 380 U.S. 359 (1965).

The commencement date for benefits is the month in which the miner became totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis. 20 C.F.R. §725.503; see Lykins v. Director, OWCP, 12 BLR 1-181, 1-184 (1989). Where a miner suffers from complicated pneumoconiosis, the fact-finder must consider whether the evidence establishes the date of onset of the disease. See Williams v. Director, OWCP, 13 BLR 1-28, 1-30 (1989). If not, the commencement date is the month in which the claim was filed, unless the evidence establishes the miner had only simple pneumoconiosis for any period subsequent to the date of filing. In that case, the date for the commencement of benefits follows the period of simple pneumoconiosis. Williams, 13 BLR at 1-30; 20 C.F.R. §725.503(b).

The ALJ found the “record does not establish when Claimant’s simple pneumoconiosis became complicated pneumoconiosis,” and thus set the commencement

1We affirm, as unchallenged on appeal, the ALJ’s finding that Claimant has complicated pneumoconiosis and established entitlement to benefits. See Skrack v. Island Creek Coal Co., 6 BLR 1-710, 1-711 (1983); Decision and Order at 13.
2 The Board will apply the law of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth

Circuit because Claimant performed his last coal mine employment in Virginia. See Shupe v. Director, OWCP, 12 BLR 1-200, 1-202 (1989) (en banc); Decision and Order at 14.

2 date for benefits as the filing date of the claim. Decision and Order at 16-17. No party challenges this finding. Thus we affirm it. Skrack v. Island Creek Coal Co., 6 BLR 1-710, 1-711 (1983). Although the ALJ recognized Claimant filed this claim in January 2017, he set a commencement date of April 2016. Decision and Order at 2, 17. We agree with the parties’s contentions that this appears to be a scrivener’s error. Consequently, we modify the ALJ’s decision to reflect that benefits are payable from January 2017, the month in which Claimant filed his claim. 20 C.F.R. §725.503(b).

Accordingly, the ALJ’s Decision and Order Awarding Benefits is affirmed, as modified to reflect a commencement date of January 2017 for the payment of benefits.

SO ORDERED.

JUDITH S. BOGGS, Chief
Administrative Appeals Judge

JONATHAN ROLFE
Administrative Appeals Judge

MELISSA LIN JONES
Administrative Appeals Judge

3

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace