Laith Kappouta v. Global Linguist Solutions, LLC (Board decision, June 25, 2020)
Kappouta v. Global Linguist Solutions (BRB 20-0321): employer appeal withdrawn
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2020 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.
BRB final decision. This unpublished order is not precedent. The Board dismissed the employer's appeal with prejudice after granting its withdrawal request. A Board decision ordinarily becomes final 60 days after issuance unless a timely petition for judicial review or Board reconsideration is filed under 20 C.F.R. § 802.406. A party may request Board reconsideration within 30 days under 20 C.F.R. § 802.407.
Plain-English summary
Global Linguist Solutions appealed a district director's order approving a settlement in Laith Kappouta's case. The employer disputed the date on which the order was filed and served, and it sought a correction from the district director. After the district director issued an errata order correcting that date, the employer asked to withdraw its appeal. The Board granted the request and dismissed the appeal with prejudice. This order does not review the terms of the settlement.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Withdrawal and dismissal of an appeal under 20 C.F.R. § 802.401(a).
- Outcome: Employer's appeal dismissed with prejudice at its request.
- Key point: The employer withdrew its appeal after the district director corrected the filing and service date.
Full text (DOL BRB public release)
U.S. Department of Labor
Benefits Review Board
200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001
BRB No. 20-0321
OWCP No. 02-222211
LAITH KAPPOUTA
)
)
Claimant-Respondent
)
)
v. )
)
GLOBAL LINGUIST SOLUTIONS, LLC
)
) DATE ISSUED: 06/25/2020
and
)
)
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
)
COMPANY
)
)
Employer/Carrier-
)
Petitioners
) ORDER
On June 4, 2020, employer filed an appeal of the Order Approving Agreed Settlement - Section 8(i) (Order) of District Director David Duhon. 33 U.S.C. §921(a); 20 C.F.R. §§802.201, 802.205(a). Employer indicated it was appealing the date the District Director allegedly filed and served the Order, noting it had filed a motion for an erratum order with the District Director. This appeal is assigned the Board’s docket number 20-
0321. 20 C.F.R. §802.210.
On June 5, 2020, employer filed a motion to withdraw its appeal, as the District
Director entered an Errata Order correcting the date of filing and service of the original
Order. We grant employer’s motion to withdraw its appeal and dismiss it with prejudice.
20 C.F.R. §802.401(a).
SO ORDERED.
JUDITH S. BOGGS, Chief
Administrative Appeals Judge
GREG J. BUZZARD
Administrative Appeals Judge
DANIEL T. GRESH
Administrative Appeals Judge
2
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace