Ronnie Holland v. Flatwoods Coal Company (Board decision, February 24, 2022)

Holland v. Flatwoods Coal Company (BRB 20-0174 BLA): employer reconsideration denied

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
20-0174R BLA
Decided
February 24, 2022
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-12

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2022 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. This unpublished order is not precedent. The Benefits Review Board denied the employer's timely reconsideration motion, leaving its earlier affirmance of Ronnie Holland's black lung benefits award in place. Board finality is governed by 20 C.F.R. § 802.406; the order disposes of the reconsideration request under 20 C.F.R. § 802.407.

Plain-English summary

Flatwoods Coal Company and its carrier asked the Board to reconsider its June 28, 2021 decision affirming Ronnie Holland's benefits award. Holland opposed the motion. After reviewing the employer's arguments, no panel member voted to vacate or modify the earlier decision. The Board denied reconsideration, leaving the benefits award in place.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Reconsideration under 33 U.S.C. § 921(b)(5) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 802.407 and 802.409.
  • Outcome: Employer's reconsideration motion denied.
  • Key point: No panel member voted to change the earlier affirmance of benefits.

Full text (DOL BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor
Benefits Review Board
200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB No. 20-0174 BLA

RONNIE HOLLAND
)
)
Claimant-Respondent
)
)
v. )
)
FLATWOODS COAL COMPANY
)
)
Employer/Carrier-
) DATE ISSUED: 02/24/2022
Petitioners
)
)
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’
)
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
)
) ORDER on MOTION for
Party-in-Interest
) RECONSIDERATION

Employer and its Carrier have filed a timely motion for reconsideration of the Benefits Review Board’s Decision and Order in Holland v. Flatwoods Coal Co., BRB No.
20-0174 BLA (June 28, 2021) (unpub.), affirming the award of benefits. 33 U.S.C.
§921(b)(5); 20 C.F.R. §802.407(a). Claimant opposes Employer’s motion. After
consideration of Employer’s contentions, no member of the panel has voted to vacate or
modify the Board’s decision. Therefore, Employer’s motion for reconsideration is denied.
20 C.F.R. §§801.301(c), 802.409.

By Order of the Board:

Thomas O. Shepherd, Jr.
Clerk of the Appellate Boards

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace