Nathan L. Gourdine v. AECOM and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Board decision, January 16, 2020)

Gourdine v. AECOM (BRB 20-0065): claimant's appeal withdrawn

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
20-0065
Decided
January 16, 2020
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-23

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2020 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2020
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. This unpublished order is not precedent. The Benefits Review Board dismissed Nathan Gourdine's appeal with prejudice at his request. Board finality is governed by 20 C.F.R. § 802.406; a party may request Board reconsideration within 30 days under § 802.407.

Plain-English summary

Nathan Gourdine asked to withdraw his appeal in a claim involving AECOM and its insurer. The Board granted his request and dismissed the appeal with prejudice. This short order gives no reason for the withdrawal and makes no ruling on the claim's merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Voluntary withdrawal under 20 C.F.R. § 802.401(a).
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed with prejudice.
  • Key point: The Board ended this appeal after Gourdine requested withdrawal.

Full text (DOL BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor
Benefits Review Board
200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB No. 20-0065

NATHAN L. GOURDINE
)
)
Claimant-Petitioner
)
)
v. )
)
AECOM
)
) DATE ISSUED: 01/16/2020
and
)
)
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE
)
OF PENNSYLVANIA c/o AIG GLOBAL
)
SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
)
)
Employer/Carrier-
)
Respondents
)
)
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’
)
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
)
)
Party-in-Interest
) ORDER

By letter filed January 6, 2010, claimant moves to withdraw his appeal in this case.
We grant claimant’s motion and dismiss his appeal with prejudice. 20 C.F.R. §802.401(a).


JUDITH S. BOGGS, Chief
Administrative Appeals Judge

GREG J. BUZZARD
Administrative Appeals Judge

DANIEL T. GRESH
Administrative Appeals Judge


What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace