Allen B. Flores v. Pacific Crane Maintenance Company, L.P. and Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Limited (Board decision, January 14, 2020)

Flores v. Pacific Crane Maintenance (BRB 19-0386): reconsideration denied

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
19-0386
Decided
January 14, 2020
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-23

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2020 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2020
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. This unpublished order is not precedent. The Benefits Review Board denied Allen Flores's reconsideration motion and left its earlier decision in place. Board finality is governed by 20 C.F.R. § 802.406; this order disposes of the reconsideration request under § 802.407.

Plain-English summary

Allen Flores asked the Board to reconsider its earlier decision in his longshore benefits case against Pacific Crane Maintenance and Signal Mutual. The employer opposed his motion. After considering the arguments, no member of the panel voted to vacate or modify the earlier decision. The Board denied reconsideration and affirmed that decision. This order does not give a new ruling on the underlying benefits issues.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Reconsideration under 33 U.S.C. § 921(b)(5) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 802.407, 801.301(c), and 802.409.
  • Outcome: Claimant's reconsideration motion denied; earlier Board decision affirmed.
  • Key point: No panel member voted to change the earlier decision.

Full text (DOL BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor
Benefits Review Board
200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB No. 19-0386

ALLEN B. FLORES
)
)
Claimant-Petitioner
)
)
v. )
)
PACIFIC CRANE MAINTENANCE
)
COMPANY, L.P.
)
)
and
)
) DATE ISSUED: 01/14/2020
SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY
)
ASSOCIATION, LIMITED
)
)
Employer/Carrier-
)
Respondent
)
)
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN
)
)
Intervenor
) ORDER

Claimant has filed a timely motion for reconsideration of the Board’s decision in this case, Flores v. Pacific Crane Maint. Co., L.P., BRB No. 19-0386 (Jan. 14, 2020). 33 U.S.C. §921(b)(5);
20 C.F.R. §802.407. Employer filed a response in opposition to claimant’s motion. After
consideration of claimant’s contentions, no member of the panel has voted to vacate or modify the
Board’s decision. Accordingly, claimant’s motion for reconsideration is denied and the Board’s
decision is affirmed. 20 C.F.R. §§801.301(c); 802.409.

By Order of the Board:

Thomas O. Shepherd, Jr.
Clerk of the Appellate Boards

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace