Luke Lapotsky v. Pagnotti Enterprises, Incorporated (Board decision, June 28, 2022)

Lapotsky v. Pagnotti Enterprises (BRB 19-0367 BLA): reconsideration denied

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
19-0367R BLA
Decided
June 28, 2022
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-12

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2022 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. This unpublished order is not precedent. The Benefits Review Board denied Luke Lapotsky's timely request to reconsider its earlier affirmance of the denial of black lung benefits. Board finality is governed by 20 C.F.R. § 802.406; this order disposes of the reconsideration request filed under 20 C.F.R. § 802.407.

Plain-English summary

Luke Lapotsky asked the Board to reconsider its July 2020 decision affirming the denial of his black lung benefits claim against Pagnotti Enterprises. The Board said the request was timely. No member of the panel voted to grant reconsideration, so the Board denied the request. This order leaves the earlier denial of benefits in place.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Reconsideration under 33 U.S.C. § 921(b)(5) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 801.301(c), 802.407(a), and 802.409.
  • Outcome: Claimant's reconsideration request denied; earlier denial of benefits left in place.
  • Key point: No Board panel member voted to grant reconsideration.

Full text (DOL BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor
Benefits Review Board
200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB No. 19-0367 BLA

LUKE LAPOTSKY
)
)
Claimant-Petitioner
)
)
v. )
)
PAGNOTTI ENTERPRISES,
)
INCORPORATED
)
)
and
)
) DATE ISSUED: 6/28/2022
STATE WORKERS’ INSURANCE FUND
)
)
Employer/Carrier-
)
Respondents
)
)
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’
)
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
)
) ORDER on
Party-in-Interest
) RECONSIDERATION

Claimant has filed a timely motion for reconsideration of the Benefits Review Board’s decision in this case, Lapotsky v Pagnotti Enterprises, Inc., BRB No. 19-0367 BLA (July 30, 2020) (unpub.), affirming the denial of benefits. 33 U.S.C. §921(b)(5); 20 C.F.R. §802.407(a). No member of the panel has voted to grant reconsideration.
Therefore, Claimant’s motion for reconsideration is denied. 20 C.F.R. §§801.301(c),
802.409.
By Order of the Board:

Thomas O. Shepherd, Jr.
Clerk of the Appellate Boards

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace