Ronald Eckhoff v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (Board decision, November 6, 2019)

Eckhoff v. Huntington Ingalls (BRB 19-0031): reconsideration denied

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
19-0031
Decided
November 6, 2019
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-16

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2019 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2019
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. This unpublished decision is not precedent. The Benefits Review Board resolved this appeal. A final Board decision ordinarily becomes final 60 days after issuance absent timely judicial review or reconsideration under 20 C.F.R. § 802.406; a party may request Board reconsideration within 30 days under 20 C.F.R. § 802.407.

Plain-English summary

Ronald Eckhoff and Huntington Ingalls each asked the Board to reconsider its August 6, 2019 decision; Eckhoff also requested review by the full Board. A majority of permanent Board members did not vote to vacate or modify the decision. The Board denied the reconsideration motions.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 20 C.F.R. § 802.407(d).
  • Outcome: Reconsideration and full Board review motions denied.
  • Key point: The prior Board decision was left in place.

Full text (DOL BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor Benefits Review Board 200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB No. 19-0031
Case No. 2017-LHC-00444

RONALD ECKHOFF
)
)
Claimant-Petitioner
)
)
v. ) DATE ISSUED: 11/06/2019
)
HUNTINGTON INGALLS,
)
INCORPORATED
)
)
Self-Insured
) ORDER on
Employer-Respondent
) RECONSIDERATION

Claimant and employer have each filed a timely motion for reconsideration of the Board’s August 6, 2019, Decision and Order in the captioned case. In addition, claimant moves for reconsideration en banc. 33 U.S.C. §921(b)(5); 20 C.F.R. §802.407(a), (b). As a majority of the permanent members of the Board has not voted to vacate or modify the Board’s decision, the motions for reconsideration are denied. 20 C.F.R. §§802.301(c), 802.407(d), 802.409.

By Order of the Board:

Thomas O. Shepherd, Jr.
Clerk of the Appellate Boards

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace