Tufa Iuvale v. Coastal Marine Services (Board decision, March 12, 2019)

Iuvale v. Coastal Marine Services (BRB 18-0159): employer reconsideration denied

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
18-0159, 18-0159A
Decided
March 12, 2019
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-14

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2019 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2019
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. This unpublished decision is not precedent. A Board decision ordinarily becomes final 60 days after issuance unless a timely petition for judicial review or Board reconsideration is filed under 20 C.F.R. § 802.406. A party may request Board reconsideration within 30 days under 20 C.F.R. § 802.407.

Plain-English summary

Coastal Marine Services and its carrier asked the Benefits Review Board to reconsider its earlier decision in Tufa Iuvale’s case. Iuvale opposed the motion, and the employer replied. No member of the Board voted to vacate or modify the earlier decision. The Board denied reconsideration and affirmed that decision. This order does not describe the underlying benefits dispute.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Board reconsideration under 20 C.F.R. §§ 802.407 and 802.409.
  • Outcome: Employer’s motion for reconsideration denied; prior decision affirmed.
  • Key point: No Board member voted to change the earlier decision.

Full text (DOL BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor Benefits Review Board 200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB Nos. 18-0159 and 18-0159A

TUFA IUVALE
)
)
Claimant-Respondent
)
Cross-Petitioner
)
)
v. ) DATE ISSUED: 03/12/2019
)
COASTAL MARINE SERVICES
)
)
and
)
)
SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY
)
)
Employer/Carrier-
)
Petitioners
)
Employer/Carrier-
) ORDER on MOTION for
Cross-Respondents
) RECONSIDERATION

Employer has filed a timely motion for reconsideration of the Board’s decision in the captioned case, Iuvale v. Coastal Marine Services, BRB Nos. 18-0159/A (Dec. 13, 2018). 33 U.S.C. §921(b)(5); 20 C.F.R. §802.407. Claimant responded in opposition to employer’s motion, to which employer replied. After consideration of employer’s contentions, no member of the panel has voted to vacate or modify the Board’s decision. Accordingly, employer’s motion for reconsideration is denied, and the Board’s decision is affirmed. 20 C.F.R. §§801.301(c), 802.409.

By Order of the Board:

Thomas O. Shepherd, Jr.
Clerk of the Appellate Boards

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace