Claris I. Fite Rose v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (Board decision, March 28, 2019)

Fite Rose v. OWCP (BRB 17-0421): reconsideration denied

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
17-0421 BLO
Decided
March 28, 2019
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Unpublished Board decision, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-14

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2019 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2019
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BRB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

BRB final decision. This unpublished order is not precedent. The Board denied reconsideration because no panel member voted to change the earlier decision. A Board decision ordinarily becomes final 60 days after issuance unless a timely petition for judicial review or Board reconsideration is filed under 20 C.F.R. § 802.406; reconsideration is governed by 20 C.F.R. §§ 802.407 and 802.409.

Plain-English summary

Claris Fite Rose requested reconsideration of an earlier Benefits Review Board decision. The Board's order states that no panel member voted to vacate or modify that decision. It denied the motion for reconsideration. This short order does not state the facts or outcome of the underlying benefits claim.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Reconsideration under 33 U.S.C. § 921(b)(5) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 802.407(a), 802.409.
  • Outcome: Motion for reconsideration denied.
  • Key point: No panel member voted to change the earlier decision.

Full text (DOL BRB public release)

U.S. Department of Labor Benefits Review Board 200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

BRB No. 17-0421 BLO

CLARIS I. FITE ROSE
)
)
Claimant-Petitioner
)
)
)
v. ) DATE ISSUED: 03/28/2019
)
)
)
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’
)
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
)
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
)
) ORDER on
Respondent
) RECONSIDERATION

As no member of the panel has voted to vacate or modify the decision herein, the motion for reconsideration filed by claimant is DENIED. 33 U.S.C. §921(b)(5); 20 C.F.R.
§§801.301(b), 802.407(a), 802.409.

By Order of the Board:

Thomas O. Shepherd, Jr.
Clerk of the Appellate Boards

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current statutes and regulations the Board applies and Board precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace